Insight

Leading the Way

Cross-examination is a powerful tool that you can use during your case-in-chief

Aaron D. Bundy

Aaron D. Bundy

August 18, 2020 10:37 PM

When a witness is hostile, an adverse party, or identified with an adverse party, we can tell our client’s story on direct using leading questions. Our job as trial lawyers is to present information to judges and juries that helps them reach a decision. The attention span of our decision-maker is something we must consider in every trial. Judges and juries reasonably expect an efficient presentation of important information to help them reach their conclusion. In today’s society, thirty-minute tv shows and thirty-second commercials have conditioned our attention spans. Most shows provide seven minutes of content before breaking for a commercial. Seven minutes is generally the maximum time we can plan to hold the attention of the Judge or Jury on a single topic. Perceived importance of each topic is associated with when the topic is brought up and how much time is devoted to discussion of the topic. With advance preparation, leading questions are a powerful tool for us to efficiently deliver key facts and keep the decision-maker’s attention.

In trial, we ask questions very differently to friendly witnesses than to hostile witnesses, because we have different goals for those witnesses. We ask open-ended questions to friendly witnesses, and we ask leading questions to witnesses against us. 12 O.S. § 2611(D) tells us,

Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness’s testimony. Leading questions should ordinarily be permitted on cross-examination. When a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party, leading questions may be used on direct examination.

This rule helps our witnesses tell their story in response to open-ended questions, and the rule recognizes what we all know: “Cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth.” John H. Wigmore, quoted in Lilly v. Virginia, 527 U.S. 116 (1999). The goal with friendly witnesses is for the story to be told, facts to be communicated and a connection to be made between the witness and the factfinder. Open-ended questions are the best method to accomplish these goals. Conversely, with adverse and hostile witnesses, our goals are to establish facts that help our case or hurt theirs, impeach the witness, or show bias. These goals are best accomplished through the use of leading questions.

By permitting us to lead hostile witnesses on direct, 12 O.S. § 2611(D) gives us a powerful tool for dealing with witnesses who may not want to fully cooperate in telling our client’s story even though the facts of our client’s story are true. The Oklahoma Supreme Court endorsed this approach in strong terms in the case of Three M Investments, Inc., v. Ahrend Co., 827 P.2d 1324, 1992, OK 33. Three M was the plaintiff in the lawsuit. Id. at ¶ 4. Three M’s lawyer recognized and took advantage of the benefit of 12 O.S. § 2611(D), calling defendant Ahrend on direct in Three M’s case-in-chief. Id. at ¶ 17. Because Ahrend was the defendant, the trial court allowed Three M’s lawyer to use leading questions. Id. This made Ahrend’s lawyer very upset, because he did not understand the rule or its purpose. Id. at ¶ 23. Once Three M’s lawyers were finished, Ahrend’s lawyer was even more upset when he was not allowed to lead Ahrend client on “cross-examination.” Id. at ¶¶ 17-18. Ahrend appealed the issue.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court firmly upheld the trial court and gave a detailed analysis of the purpose and policy behind 12 O.S. § 2611(D). Concerning calling the opposing party in direct and leading them, the Oklahoma Supreme Court said we are entitled to do it:

The intent of the statute is that litigants are entitled to call the opposing party as a witness in the former's case in chief. Inherently, that witness will be adverse to the case the litigant is trying to prove. Thus, the litigant is entitled to use leading questions to elicit the testimony from the witness.

Ahrend at ¶ 21. The Oklahoma Supreme Court went on to say that when we take the initiative and call the opposing party and use leading questions, the opposing party’s lawyer may not use leading questions of their client. Id. at ¶ 22. “[T]he statute's intent is not to allow counsel for one litigant to use leading questions to steer that litigant in the direction counsel wants them to go. The Evidence Subcommittee's Notes clearly indicate that § 2611 was not intended to allow such a result.” Id.

The rule helps everyone. When we are able to use leading questions, we can deliver facts efficiently, rather than in a narrative, open-ended manner. The judge and jury benefit because efficiency means we are not wasting their time. We benefit because we can deliver facts quickly for our decision-makers’ short attentions spans, and our story is told through adverse witnesses with a higher degree of credibility -- they wouldn’t admit the fact unless it were true. Finally, we benefit when the opposing party’s lawyer must present their facts in a narrative way, using open-ended questions, rather than the unfair use of leading questions for their client.

Deciding whether or not to call the opposing party in our case-in-chief is one of many choices we have to make before trial. A justifiable fear about doing so is that the opposing party may be able tell its version of the facts and take over the case. Leading questions minimize that risk and give us the power to establish important, favorable facts through adverse witnesses on direct examination.

Related Articles

The Next Generation of Family Law


by Sean Stonefield

Vitaly Family Law earns high firm rankings to cement its leading reputation.

Vitaly Law

Driven, Obsessed, and Loving Every Minute


by Susan K. Bozorgi

Cris Arguedas on defending the accused.

Driven Obsessed

Trending Articles

2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.


by Jennifer Verta

Introducing the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America and the fifth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.

Digital map of the United States illuminated by numerous bright lights

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence


by Jennifer Verta

Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Digital map of Canadathis on illuminated by numerous bright lights

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Find the Best Lawyers for Your Needs


by Jennifer Verta

Discover how Best Lawyers simplifies the attorney search process.

A focused woman with dark hair wearing a green top and beige blazer, working on a tablet in a dimly

Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?


by Christine Bestor Townsend

One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.

Illustration of two men pulling on string with blue door between them