Yesterday, Tesla confirmed that the government is actively investigating the first reported fatality involving the company’s “auto-pilot” technology. The fatal crash occurred on May 6 in Williston, Florida, claiming the life of former Navy SEAL Joshua Brown. According to Tesla’s public statement about the crash, the car’s autopilot feature failed to notice the white side of a tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky. As a result, the software failed to apply the brakes, and the car’s windshield struck the bottom of the trailer.
As we have previously written, “autonomous” or “self-driving” automotive technology has the capability to save lives, if implemented correctly. A self-driving vehicle should theoretically perform better than a human driver if it operates according to a computer code that properly accounts for the surrounding environment and changes in traffic conditions. However, when technology reaches the market before it is ready, software bugs and design flaws may go unnoticed until it is too late. We’ve all had a computer crash unexpectedly. Now imagine if that computer was supposed to be making the call as to when to apply the brakes during rush hour.
Well-developed negligence and strict products liability law already provide the best solution for those instances where self-driving technology fails and results in injury or death. Under a negligence or strict liability theory, the manufacturer would be held accountable if a design defect caused or contributed to the crash. The determination as to whether the software had a defect would, in turn, be made in the same manner that these kinds of determinations have always been made—by a civil jury.
Time and time again, the civil jury system has proven the best way to get to the truth in product defect cases. Each and every automotive crash is unique, and the determination as to whether a product had a defect that played into a crash must necessarily be made only after carefully reviewing the circumstances of that particular crash. The jury system allows for this type of case-by-case analysis to be conducted in open court, with each party having a fair opportunity to present their claims and defenses.
Unfortunately, auto manufacturers are now actively lobbying federal lawmakers to strip citizens of their rights to a jury trial should they find themselves in the same predicament as the Brown family. Their weapon of choice in this regard is federal preemption. Specifically, they are seeking what could be an often-times insurmountable defense whereby regulations implemented by Washington bureaucrats would forever trump the right of any individual citizen involved in a self-driving vehicle crash from seeking relief in the courts.
Earlier this year, the US Department of Transportation announced that it was working on guidance with respect to self-driving vehicle technology. Since then, both the DOT and the Senate have held hearings in Washington to address the issue. The DOT guidance is supposed to be released sometime this month.
Stay tuned. We will continue to monitor and provide updates on the key legal and regulatory battles with respect to self-driving vehicles as they unfold.
For more information, follow the source link below.
Insight
Self-Driving Vehicles and Federal Preemption
Well-developed negligence and strict products liability law already provide the best solution for those instances where self-driving technology fails and results in injury or death.
Related Articles
Trending Articles
Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.
Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™
by Best Lawyers
The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.
How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.
How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power
by Gregory Sirico
Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.
Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.
Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.
Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025
by Best Lawyers
For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.
The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition
by Best Lawyers
For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.
Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.
How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.
Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.
Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide
by Best Lawyers
The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.
Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You
by Ellie Shaffer
In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.
Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias
by Sloan L. Abernathy
Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?
