Nate’s practice focuses on insurance bad faith and coverage litigation, commercial litigation, general liability litigation, and professional liability litigation. He represents insurance companies, insurance adjusters, global corporations, contractors, business owners, insurance agents, and professionals. He handles all aspects of insurance-related litigation, including advising and defending insurers in bad faith litigation, drafting coverage opinions, advising and defending insurers in UM/UIM litigation, litigating declaratory judgment actions, defending liability claims, and advising/defending insurers when policy holders enter million dollar Damron, Morris, or Helme Agreements.
Nate works with clients that insist on doing things “the right way.” He believes that early case analysis, accurate estimation of litigation costs, frequent client communication, and honest recommendations are critical to effective legal representation and client satisfaction. A client must be provided information early and updated often to determine whether to litigate a matter through mediation, arbitration, dispositive motions or trial—or whether to make a merit-based or business decision to settle a case early for a fraction of litigation costs.
Nate also keeps his clients abreast of the latest developments in Arizona insurance bad faith, coverage and UM/UIM law by providing timely articles and blog posts regarding recent cases.
- E-mail: ndm@jaburgwilk.com
- Direct Phone Number: 602-248-1032
- Phone Number: 602-248-1000
- Lawyer Page: https://www.jaburgwilk.com/our-people/nathan-d-meyer
- 1850 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, AZ 85004
- The University of Iowa, J.D., with Distinction , graduated 2000
- Arizona, 2000
- U.S. District Court, District of Arizona 2000
- 9th Circut Court of Appeals 2018
Jaburg Wilk PC
14 The Best Lawyers in America® awards
5 Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America awards
Visit Website
View Firm Profile
- Litigation - Insurance
Phoenix Magazine - Top Lawyer, Insurance Coverage/Bad Faith, 2022
Named Top Author, JD Supra 2018, 2020, and 2021 Readers Choice Awards.
Best Lawyers in America- Litigation, Insurance, 2023, 2024
- Southwest Super Lawyer,2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023
- Martindale-Hubbell,Rated "AV Preeminent", 2012-Present
- Top Rated Lawyer in Commercial Litigation, American Lawyer Media and Martindale-Hubbell: 2013- Present
- Top 40 Under 40 Litigation Attorneys in Arizona, American Society of Legal Advocates: 2014, 2015
- Arizona's Finest Lawyers, Arizona's Finest Lawyers: 2014
- Insurance Law
Arizona Insureds are Legally Entitled to Recover Reasonable Rather Than Incurred Medical Expenses
Arizona Insureds are Legally Entitled to Recover Reasonable Rather Than Incurred Medical Expenses
Arizona District Court Enforces “Virus Exclusion” to Dismiss COVID-19 Related Insurance Claims of Minor League Baseball Teams
Arizona District Court Enforces “Virus Exclusion” to Dismiss COVID-19 Related Insurance Claims of Minor League Baseball Teams
Arizona District Court Holds “Reasonable” Medical Expenses Are Amounts Accepted by Providers as Payment in Full Rather Than Billed Amounts
Arizona District Court Holds “Reasonable” Medical Expenses Are Amounts Accepted by Providers as Payment in Full Rather Than Billed Amounts
Arizona Court of Appeals Holds MedPay Benefits Are Subject to Health Care Provider Liens
Arizona Court of Appeals Holds MedPay Benefits Are Subject to Health Care Provider Liens
Ninth Circuit Holds Removal Deadline Runs from Receipt of Complaint by Insurer Rather Than Insurer’s “Statutorily Designated” Agent
Ninth Circuit Holds Removal Deadline Runs from Receipt of Complaint by Insurer Rather Than Insurer’s “Statutorily Designated” Agent
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies and Heightens Punitive Damages Standard in Negligence Cases
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies and Heightens Punitive Damages Standard in Negligence Cases
Arizona Medical Liens No Longer Apply to MedPay Benefits
Arizona recently amended ARS § 33-931 so that medical payment (“MedPay”) benefits are no longer subject to health care provider liens for treatment rendered to injured persons.
Arizona Court of Appeals Confirms UM/UIM Statute of Limitations
In State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. v. Frank, 2024 WL 1202982 (Ariz.App. March 21, 2024), the Arizona Court of Appeals confirmed the District Court of Arizona’s recent interpretation of the statute of limitations for UM/UIM claims, ARS § 12-555, and rejected two novel insured arguments.
Your browser is not fully compatible with our automatic printer friendly formatting.
Please use the print button to print this profile page.