Insight

California Enacts Far-Reaching Fast Food Worker Law

California Enacts Far-Reaching Fast Food Worker Law

Frederick L. " Rick" Warren  III

Frederick L. " Rick" Warren III

December 15, 2022 04:14 PM

California Enacts Far-Reaching Fast Food Worker Law

Executive Summary: On September 5, 2022, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed A.B. 257, the Fast Food Accountability Recovery Act or FAST Recovery Act. The law was strongly supported by unions and will impact more than 500,000 fast food workers in California, their employers, and consumers.

The law establishes a 10-member Fast Food Council that will be part of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and will be in place until 2029. The Fast Food Council is to be composed of:

  • One representative of DIR;
  • One representative of the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development;
  • Two representatives of advocates for fast food restaurant employees;
  • Two representatives of fast food restaurant employees;
  • Two representatives of fast food restaurant franchisors; and
  • Two representatives of fast food restaurant franchisees.

The governor will appoint the representatives of state agencies, fast food restaurant employees, fast food restaurant franchisors, and franchisees. The speaker of the state Assembly and the state Senate Rules Committee will each appoint one representative of an advocate for fast food restaurant employees. Prior to the Fast Food Council issuing new rules or standards, 10,000 or more California fast food restaurant employees must sign a petition supporting its creation. It is anticipated that will be easily achieved.

“Fast food chain” is defined as a set of restaurants consisting of 100 or more establishments nationally that share a common brand, or that are characterized by standardized options for décor, marketing, products, and services.

“Fast food restaurant” means any establishment in the state that is part of a fast food chain and that in its regular business operations, primarily provides food or beverages in the following manner:

  • For immediate consumption either on or off the premises.
  • To customers who order or select items and pay before eating.
  • With items prepared in advance, including items that may be prepared in bulk and kept hot, or with items prepared or heated quickly.
  • With limited or no table service. Table service does not include orders placed by a customer on an electronic device.

Establishments that operate within bakeries and grocery stores are not considered fast food restaurants. This definition creates uncertainty regarding whether the law impacts certain restaurant chains.

The Fast Food Council will have broad powers to establish sector-wide minimum standards on wages, working hours, and other working conditions adequate to ensure and maintain the health, safety, and welfare of, and to supply the necessary cost of proper living to, fast food restaurant workers and to ensure and effect interagency coordination and prompt agency responses regarding issues affecting the health, safety, and employment of fast food restaurant workers. The Fast Food Council is not permitted to promulgate regulations creating new paid time off benefits, such as paid sick leave or paid vacation, or regulations regarding predictable scheduling.

On January 1, 2023, the Fast Food Council can raise the hourly minimum wage for fast food workers to as much as $22, almost 50 percent higher than the state minimum wage. On January 1, 2024 and annually thereafter, the minimum wage may increase by the lesser of 3.5 percent or the rate of change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.

The law also provides that any county or city with a population of at least 200,000 people may establish a local fast food council and may make recommendations to the Fast Food Council regarding minimum state health, safety, and employment standards.

The standards established by the Fast Food Council will be enforced by the state labor commissioner and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. Neither the Occupational Safety and Health Board nor local health departments are required to enforce standards promulgated by the Fast Food Council; however, the Fast Food Council may petition the Board for changes in safety and health standards.

A fast food restaurant operator may not discharge or in any manner discriminate or retaliate against any employee for any of the following reasons:

  • Making a complaint to the media, the legislature, a watchdog or community-based organization, or governmental agency about working conditions;
  • Participating in a Fast Food Council or local fast food council proceeding; and
  • Refusing to perform work in a fast food restaurant because the employee had reasonable cause to believe that the practices or premises of the restaurant would violate worker or public health and safety laws.

Any employee of a fast food restaurant operator discharged or otherwise discriminated or retaliated against in violation of the law shall have a right of action for reinstatement, treble damages for lost wages and benefits, and attorney’s fees. There is a rebuttable presumption of unlawful discrimination or retaliation if a fast food operator takes adverse action against one of its employees within 90 days following the date when the operator had knowledge of the employee’s protected activity.

The proposed legislation was fought by restaurant chains, restaurant associations, the International Franchise Association, and other business groups which were able to get some amendments passed before the bill became law. Business groups have already proposed a ballot measure to undo the law. Legal challenges to the law also are expected.

Employers’ Bottom Line:

This new law will complicate employment law compliance for fast food restaurants in California which already are required to follow multiple standards by other agencies. The anticipated much higher wages and other working conditions will drive up labor costs, likely accelerating the movement toward automation. The higher costs, at least in part, will be passed on to consumers in higher prices, which might adversely impact sales. There likely will be a trickle-down effect on smaller restaurants not covered by the law to increase wages and other working conditions to compete for workers in a tight labor market. The law also strengthens the hand of labor unions and their related organizations to set wages and other working conditions for an entire sector of the economy. The law also might ease organizing and collective bargaining for restaurant workers in California. Finally, other states will follow these developments and might consider implementing similar regulations.

If you have any questions regarding the FAST Recovery Act, please contact the author of this Alert, Rick Warren, rwarren@fordharrison.com, a partner in our Atlanta office and co-chair of the firm’s Restaurant Practice Group. Of course, you can also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

With Reservations


by Justin Smulison

Is vaccine liability on the menu for restaurant owners in 2021?

Vaccine Liability for Restaurant Owners

The Impact of Duran on the Certification Process in Wage and Hour Class Actions


by Tim Freudenberger and Nancy Lubrano

In May 2014, class action defense attorney Tim Freudenberger from Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP, obtained a very favorable decision from the California Supreme Court in Duran v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn., 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014).

Wage and Hour Class Actions

Trending Articles

Discover The Best Lawyers in Spain 2025 Edition


by Jennifer Verta

Highlighting Spain’s leading legal professionals and rising talents.

Flags of Spain, representing Best Lawyers country

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa


by Jennifer Verta

Best Lawyers celebrates the finest in law, reaffirming its commitment to the global legal community.

Flags of Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa, representing Best Lawyers countries

Presenting the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Puerto Rico


by Jennifer Verta

Celebrating top legal professionals in South America and the Caribbean.

Flags of Puerto Rico, Chile, Colombia, and Peru, representing countries featured in the Best Lawyers

How to Increase Your Online Visibility With a Legal Directory Profile


by Jennifer Verta

Maximize your firm’s reach with a legal directory profile.

Image of a legal directory profile

Paramount Hit With NY Class Action Lawsuit Over Mass Layoffs


by Gregory Sirico

Paramount Global faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly violating New York's WARN Act after laying off 300+ employees without proper notice in September.

Animated man in suit being erased with Paramount logo in background

Tampa Appeals Court ‘Sends Clear Message,” Ensuring School Tax Referendum Stays on Ballot


by Gregory Sirico

Hillsborough County's tax referendum is back on the 2024 ballot, promising $177 million for schools and empowering residents to decide the future of education.

Graduation cap in air surrounded by pencils and money

The Future of Family Law: 3 Top Trends Driving the Field


by Gregory Sirico

How technology, mental health awareness and alternative dispute resolution are transforming family law to better support evolving family dynamics.

Animated child looking at staircase to beach scene

The Human Cost


by Justin Smulison

2 new EU laws aim to reshape global business by enforcing ethical supply chains, focusing on human rights and sustainability

Worker wearing hat stands in field carrying equipment

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

Safe Drinking Water Is the Law, First Nations Tell Canada in $1.1B Class Action


by Gregory Sirico

Canada's argument that it has "no legal obligation" to provide First Nations with clean drinking water has sparked a major human rights debate.

Individual drinking water in front of window

Effective Communication: A Conversation with Jefferson Fisher


by Jamilla Tabbara

The power of effective communication beyond the law.

 Image of Jefferson Fisher and Phillip Greer engaged in a conversation about effective communication

New Mass. Child Custody Bills Could Transform US Family Law


by Gregory Sirico

How new shared-parenting child custody bills may reshape family law in the state and set a national precedent.

Two children in a field holding hands with parents

Best Lawyers Expands With New Artificial Intelligence Practice Area


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers introduces Artificial Intelligence Law to recognize attorneys leading the way in AI-related legal issues and innovation.

AI network expanding in front of bookshelf

Finding the Right Divorce Attorney


by Best Lawyers

Divorce proceedings are inherently a complex legal undertaking. Hiring the right divorce attorney can make all the difference in the outcome of any case.

Person at a computer holding a phone and pen

Jefferson Fisher: The Secrets to Influential Legal Marketing


by Jennifer Verta

How lawyers can apply Jefferson Fisher’s communication and marketing strategies to build trust, attract clients and grow their practice.

Portrait of Jefferson Fisher a legal marketing expert

New Texas Law Opens Door for Non-Lawyers to Practice


by Gregory Sirico

Texas is at a critical turning point in addressing longstanding legal challenges. Could licensing paralegals to provide legal services to low-income and rural communities close the justice gap?

Animated figures walk up a steep hill with hand