Insight

California Enacts Far-Reaching Fast Food Worker Law

California Enacts Far-Reaching Fast Food Worker Law

Frederick L. " Rick" Warren  III

Frederick L. " Rick" Warren III

December 15, 2022 04:14 PM

California Enacts Far-Reaching Fast Food Worker Law

Executive Summary: On September 5, 2022, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed A.B. 257, the Fast Food Accountability Recovery Act or FAST Recovery Act. The law was strongly supported by unions and will impact more than 500,000 fast food workers in California, their employers, and consumers.

The law establishes a 10-member Fast Food Council that will be part of the California Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and will be in place until 2029. The Fast Food Council is to be composed of:

  • One representative of DIR;
  • One representative of the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development;
  • Two representatives of advocates for fast food restaurant employees;
  • Two representatives of fast food restaurant employees;
  • Two representatives of fast food restaurant franchisors; and
  • Two representatives of fast food restaurant franchisees.

The governor will appoint the representatives of state agencies, fast food restaurant employees, fast food restaurant franchisors, and franchisees. The speaker of the state Assembly and the state Senate Rules Committee will each appoint one representative of an advocate for fast food restaurant employees. Prior to the Fast Food Council issuing new rules or standards, 10,000 or more California fast food restaurant employees must sign a petition supporting its creation. It is anticipated that will be easily achieved.

“Fast food chain” is defined as a set of restaurants consisting of 100 or more establishments nationally that share a common brand, or that are characterized by standardized options for décor, marketing, products, and services.

“Fast food restaurant” means any establishment in the state that is part of a fast food chain and that in its regular business operations, primarily provides food or beverages in the following manner:

  • For immediate consumption either on or off the premises.
  • To customers who order or select items and pay before eating.
  • With items prepared in advance, including items that may be prepared in bulk and kept hot, or with items prepared or heated quickly.
  • With limited or no table service. Table service does not include orders placed by a customer on an electronic device.

Establishments that operate within bakeries and grocery stores are not considered fast food restaurants. This definition creates uncertainty regarding whether the law impacts certain restaurant chains.

The Fast Food Council will have broad powers to establish sector-wide minimum standards on wages, working hours, and other working conditions adequate to ensure and maintain the health, safety, and welfare of, and to supply the necessary cost of proper living to, fast food restaurant workers and to ensure and effect interagency coordination and prompt agency responses regarding issues affecting the health, safety, and employment of fast food restaurant workers. The Fast Food Council is not permitted to promulgate regulations creating new paid time off benefits, such as paid sick leave or paid vacation, or regulations regarding predictable scheduling.

On January 1, 2023, the Fast Food Council can raise the hourly minimum wage for fast food workers to as much as $22, almost 50 percent higher than the state minimum wage. On January 1, 2024 and annually thereafter, the minimum wage may increase by the lesser of 3.5 percent or the rate of change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.

The law also provides that any county or city with a population of at least 200,000 people may establish a local fast food council and may make recommendations to the Fast Food Council regarding minimum state health, safety, and employment standards.

The standards established by the Fast Food Council will be enforced by the state labor commissioner and the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement. Neither the Occupational Safety and Health Board nor local health departments are required to enforce standards promulgated by the Fast Food Council; however, the Fast Food Council may petition the Board for changes in safety and health standards.

A fast food restaurant operator may not discharge or in any manner discriminate or retaliate against any employee for any of the following reasons:

  • Making a complaint to the media, the legislature, a watchdog or community-based organization, or governmental agency about working conditions;
  • Participating in a Fast Food Council or local fast food council proceeding; and
  • Refusing to perform work in a fast food restaurant because the employee had reasonable cause to believe that the practices or premises of the restaurant would violate worker or public health and safety laws.

Any employee of a fast food restaurant operator discharged or otherwise discriminated or retaliated against in violation of the law shall have a right of action for reinstatement, treble damages for lost wages and benefits, and attorney’s fees. There is a rebuttable presumption of unlawful discrimination or retaliation if a fast food operator takes adverse action against one of its employees within 90 days following the date when the operator had knowledge of the employee’s protected activity.

The proposed legislation was fought by restaurant chains, restaurant associations, the International Franchise Association, and other business groups which were able to get some amendments passed before the bill became law. Business groups have already proposed a ballot measure to undo the law. Legal challenges to the law also are expected.

Employers’ Bottom Line:

This new law will complicate employment law compliance for fast food restaurants in California which already are required to follow multiple standards by other agencies. The anticipated much higher wages and other working conditions will drive up labor costs, likely accelerating the movement toward automation. The higher costs, at least in part, will be passed on to consumers in higher prices, which might adversely impact sales. There likely will be a trickle-down effect on smaller restaurants not covered by the law to increase wages and other working conditions to compete for workers in a tight labor market. The law also strengthens the hand of labor unions and their related organizations to set wages and other working conditions for an entire sector of the economy. The law also might ease organizing and collective bargaining for restaurant workers in California. Finally, other states will follow these developments and might consider implementing similar regulations.

If you have any questions regarding the FAST Recovery Act, please contact the author of this Alert, Rick Warren, rwarren@fordharrison.com, a partner in our Atlanta office and co-chair of the firm’s Restaurant Practice Group. Of course, you can also contact the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

With Reservations


by Justin Smulison

Is vaccine liability on the menu for restaurant owners in 2021?

Vaccine Liability for Restaurant Owners

The Impact of Duran on the Certification Process in Wage and Hour Class Actions


by Tim Freudenberger and Nancy Lubrano

In May 2014, class action defense attorney Tim Freudenberger from Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP, obtained a very favorable decision from the California Supreme Court in Duran v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn., 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014).

Wage and Hour Class Actions

Trending Articles

2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.


by Jennifer Verta

Introducing the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America and the fifth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.

Digital map of the United States illuminated by numerous bright lights

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence


by Jennifer Verta

Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Digital map of Canadathis on illuminated by numerous bright lights

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Presenting the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Puerto Rico


by Jennifer Verta

Celebrating top legal professionals in South America and the Caribbean.

Flags of Puerto Rico, Chile, Colombia, and Peru, representing countries featured in the Best Lawyers

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa


by Jennifer Verta

Best Lawyers celebrates the finest in law, reaffirming its commitment to the global legal community.

Flags of Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa, representing Best Lawyers countries

Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform


by Jennifer Verta

Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.

Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Tampa Appeals Court ‘Sends Clear Message,” Ensuring School Tax Referendum Stays on Ballot


by Gregory Sirico

Hillsborough County's tax referendum is back on the 2024 ballot, promising $177 million for schools and empowering residents to decide the future of education.

Graduation cap in air surrounded by pencils and money

Find the Best Lawyers for Your Needs


by Jennifer Verta

Discover how Best Lawyers simplifies the attorney search process.

A focused woman with dark hair wearing a green top and beige blazer, working on a tablet in a dimly

Key Developments and Trends in U.S. Commercial Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whether it's multibillion-dollar water cleanliness verdicts or college athletes vying for the right to compensation, the state of litigation remains strong.

Basketball sits in front of stacks of money

Woman on a Mission


by Rebecca Blackwell

Baker Botts partner and intellectual property chair Christa Brown-Sanford discusses how she juggles work, personal life, being a mentor and leadership duties.

Woman in green dress crossing her arms and posing for headshot

Best Lawyers Celebrates Women in the Law: Ninth Edition


by Alliccia Odeyemi

Released in both print and digital form, Best Lawyers Ninth Edition of Women in the Law features stories of inspiring leadership and timely legal issues.

Lawyer in green dress stands with hands on table and cityscape in background

The Human Cost


by Justin Smulison

2 new EU laws aim to reshape global business by enforcing ethical supply chains, focusing on human rights and sustainability

Worker wearing hat stands in field carrying equipemtn

Beyond the Billables


by Michele M. Jochner

In a recently conducted, comprehensive study, data reveals a plethora of hidden realities that parents working full-time in the legal industry face every day.

Women in business attire pushing stroller takes a phone call