Insight

Can Surveillance Be Used to Disprove LTD Claims?

For claimants who know that their actions are being observed, the experience can be extremely stressful. Some people report feeling like they are being treated like 'criminals' even though they have done no wrong. If your claim has been denied or terminated or you feel your rights are being infringed by constant surveillance, you should consider seeking legal advice.

David Lackman

David Lackman

August 28, 2024 06:10 PM

Dealing with an insurance company after filing a long-term disability (LTD) claim can be frustrating and stressful, especially if your benefits are denied or terminated. It can be even more challenging if you have been placed under surveillance.

When you have coverage under a health insurance policy, you have a reasonable expectation that you will receive benefits if you are injured or become ill. But let's face it, insurance providers are not in business of rubber-stamping every policyholder's claim. Rather, you can expect any LTD claim you make to be scrutinized.

Do you meet the eligibility criteria for disability benefits as outlined in your insurance policy? If you believe that you do, it is up to you to provide the required evidence to support your claim. That typically includes medical reports and doctors' clinical records. Other paperwork, such as proof of income, may also need to be submitted.

Your insurer's next step after receiving your claim will likely be an investigation to determine whether you are eligible for benefits. That could include an interview and the verification of medical documentation.

But what happens if the insurance company questions either the veracity of your claim or the extent to which your injury or condition actually satisfies the disability criteria that would entitle you to benefits? If insurers have concerns or suspicions about a claim, they could decide to investigate a policyholder by retaining the services of an investigation firm (or by using their own in-house investigators). This happens more often than most people realize.

Surveillance can be used in cases involving physical disability or mental health claims. For claimants who know that their actions are being observed, the experience can be extremely stressful. Some people report feeling like they are being treated like 'criminals' even though they have done no wrong.

If your claim has been denied or terminated or you feel your rights are being infringed by constant surveillance, you should consider seeking legal advice. The experienced and knowledgeable team of Toronto long term disability lawyers at Gluckstein Lawyers can advocate for you to ensure transparency in your interactions with your insurance provider.

Investigators Have Limits.

Surveillance of an LTD claimant can come in different forms, and it is legally permitted as long as investigators don't cross certain lines. These probes may involve monitoring various aspects of your daily routine to determine the nature and level of your activity, and at least outwardly the degree of fitness observed. Undercover investigators will typically record your interactions and physical movements by filming them and reporting back to the insurer with the footage and narrative reports. They may also seek to obtain written statements from neighbours and others who might be familiar with your activities.

While private investigators are permitted to take photos and video of you in public spaces, they are not permitted to trespass on private property, enter your home, peer inside or take footage of you inside your dwelling.

Investigators cannot legally pass themselves off as law enforcement agents, record your conversation without consent, tamper with your mail, or install tracking devices. They are not allowed to harass you.

Taking photos and video, or obtaining statements from others, is not the only weapon in an investigator's arsenal, however. Social media mining is a common tactic used by insurers to attempt to challenge a claim. While a photo or post on Facebook or Instagram will generally not provide a complete picture of a person's functionality, insurance companies may still be able to build a case against you if there is an abundance of social media postings. This is especially the case where the postings show a level of function or activity that appears to be inconsistent with the claimant's statements to his or her insurer or the medical evidence submitted in support of the claim.

If you have filed an LTD claim, it is in your best interest to keep your social media accounts private. Do not post anything that might be damaging to your claim. Even posts that you believe may be insignificant can have consequences. The best advice to an LTD claimant in the context of investigations and surveillance, is simply to refrain from posting to social media at all during the pendency of the claim. These concerns did not arise prior to the age of social media. That has now changed to the point where one's social media activity can unwittingly undermine one's LTD claim, even if the postings are misinterpreted or taken out of context.

Investigators can also conduct data surveillance, which can include simple things such as a Google check of your name or digging into court databases for potentially incriminating evidence. It is important to note that investigators can only legally access what is available to the public at large.

Surveillance Doesn't Necessarily Tell the Entire Story.

Surveillance can be pursued by an insurer when there are doubts about a long-term disability claim, and could begin when a claim is submitted or when the insurer is looking to terminate benefits.

However, photos or videos don't always tell the full story, especially if they were taken in a short window of time. Moreover, people on LTD can and do have good days leading to a greater level of activity, followed by bad days when they may "pay the price" for whatever was captured on the 'good-day'. Also, just because a claimant with a back injury can rake leaves or garden for an hour does not mean that he or she can perform their work duties over a typical workday, especially if their work involves higher-level physical or cognitive demands on a sustained or repetitive basis.

This scenario was illustrated in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Fernandes v. Penncorp. In that case, an insurer denied an injured bricklayer's claim after conducting more than 140 hours of video surveillance during a 19-day period.

The claimant was seen doing manual work. However, the Court ruled that the man was "never observed working at anything like the heavy demands of bricklaying".

"[The claimant] explained that he was in pain while he was doing this work. He was in pain at night. He took extra painkillers. He said 'I pay the price' and 'I suffer afterwards.' He said that he had two or three days of good days followed by four or five days of bad days," the Court noted.

"[He] was observed in the surveillance on August 3, 2005 to lift a wheelbarrow and a wooden skid in and out of a truck on a single occasion. He was also observed to shovel some dirt. This does not remotely establish that he was able to do the heavy continuous labour for long hours for 6 to 7 days per week that he was doing in his bricklaying occupation before he was injured." The claimant was awarded substantial contractual, punitive and aggravated damages.

LTD Advice You Can Trust.

It is natural to expect that insurers will scrutinize claims and look for reasons to deny a long-term disability claim or terminate benefits. As a claimant, you may become the subject of surveillance as your insurer attempts to gather evidence as a means of 'testing' your claim. However, you do have the right to challenge surveillance findings if you believe your disability status has been misinterpreted or otherwise characterized unfairly. And Gluckstein Lawyers is here to help.

Trending Articles

Discover The Best Lawyers in Spain 2025 Edition


by Jennifer Verta

Highlighting Spain’s leading legal professionals and rising talents.

Flags of Spain, representing Best Lawyers country

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa


by Jennifer Verta

Best Lawyers celebrates the finest in law, reaffirming its commitment to the global legal community.

Flags of Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa, representing Best Lawyers countries

Presenting the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Chile, Colombia, Peru and Puerto Rico


by Jennifer Verta

Celebrating top legal professionals in South America and the Caribbean.

Flags of Puerto Rico, Chile, Colombia, and Peru, representing countries featured in the Best Lawyers

How to Increase Your Online Visibility With a Legal Directory Profile


by Jennifer Verta

Maximize your firm’s reach with a legal directory profile.

Image of a legal directory profile

Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform


by Jennifer Verta

Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.

Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background

Paramount Hit With NY Class Action Lawsuit Over Mass Layoffs


by Gregory Sirico

Paramount Global faces a class action lawsuit for allegedly violating New York's WARN Act after laying off 300+ employees without proper notice in September.

Animated man in suit being erased with Paramount logo in background

Tampa Appeals Court ‘Sends Clear Message,” Ensuring School Tax Referendum Stays on Ballot


by Gregory Sirico

Hillsborough County's tax referendum is back on the 2024 ballot, promising $177 million for schools and empowering residents to decide the future of education.

Graduation cap in air surrounded by pencils and money

The Future of Family Law: 3 Top Trends Driving the Field


by Gregory Sirico

How technology, mental health awareness and alternative dispute resolution are transforming family law to better support evolving family dynamics.

Animated child looking at staircase to beach scene

The Human Cost


by Justin Smulison

2 new EU laws aim to reshape global business by enforcing ethical supply chains, focusing on human rights and sustainability

Worker wearing hat stands in field carrying equipment

The 2025 Legal Outlook Survey Results Are In


by Jennifer Verta

Discover what Best Lawyers honorees see ahead for the legal industry.

Person standing at a crossroads with multiple intersecting paths and a signpost.

The Litigation Finance Mass Tort Gold Rush


by Justin Smulison

Third-party litigation funding is transforming mass torts, propelling the high-risk area into a multi-billion-dollar industry

Gold coins with data chart backdrop

ERISA Reaches Its Turning Point


by Bryan Driscoll

ERISA litigation and the laws surrounding are rapidly changing, with companies fundamentally rewriting their business practices.

Beach chair and hat in front of large magnify glass

Best Lawyers Expands With New Artificial Intelligence Practice Area


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers introduces Artificial Intelligence Law to recognize attorneys leading the way in AI-related legal issues and innovation.

AI network expanding in front of bookshelf

Safe Drinking Water Is the Law, First Nations Tell Canada in $1.1B Class Action


by Gregory Sirico

Canada's argument that it has "no legal obligation" to provide First Nations with clean drinking water has sparked a major human rights debate.

Individual drinking water in front of window

New Mass. Child Custody Bills Could Transform US Family Law


by Gregory Sirico

How new shared-parenting child custody bills may reshape family law in the state and set a national precedent.

Two children in a field holding hands with parents

How US Immigration Works: Everything You Need to Know


by Jennifer Verta

Explore the pathways, processes and evolving policies shaping U.S. immigration today.

Illustration of Immigrant Family Journey in Front of American Flag