Insight

CEO Acquitted of Securities Fraud Charge

On April 19, 2017, after a two-week trial, a federal jury unanimously acquitted Revolutions Medical Corporation (RMCP) CEO Rondald Wheet on all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

CEO Acquitted

Bart Daniel

June 21, 2017 10:00 AM

On April 19, 2017, after a two-week trial, a federal jury unanimously acquitted Revolutions Medical Corporation (RMCP) CEO Rondald Wheet on all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

On February 9, 2016, the federal grand jury returned an indictment against Wheet, charging him with conspiracy to commit securities fraud and defrauding the SEC.

Bart Daniel, former United States Attorney for South Carolina, and Michael Sullivan of Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP successfully defended Wheet over the course of the trial in Charleston, South Carolina.

RMCP is a small South Carolina-based company that develops and distributes innovative products and tools for the medical industry. The company largely focuses on creating and perfecting an auto-retractable vacuum safety syringe. Their primary product— the FDA-cleared RevVac™ Auto-Retractable Vacuum Safety Syringe—was designed to substantially reduce accidental needle stick injuries, using patented vacuum technology to retract the needle directly into the plunger after use, thus preventing its reuse once its safety feature had been activated. RMCP’s RevVac syringe included five international patents and two U.S. patents in order to protect the product and RMCP.

The government contended that Wheet fraudulently issued more than 1.2 million shares of RMCP’s stock options to 11 unidentified “consultants” through the use of an S-8 form. The S-8 form is a filing with the SEC that is commonly used by startups and publically traded companies to register securities that will be offered to its employees via benefit or incentive plans. Simply put, a publicly traded company may compensate consultants with stock options in lieu of cash compensation, provided they perform legitimate services such as legal, accounting, or marketing assistance. The government alleged that these consultants were retained only to raise capital for the fledgling startup. It further alleged that no services were actually provided or intended to be provided.

Wheet faced a maximum sentence of 80 years imprisonment. The FBI had investigated the case for two years before a U.S. attorney presented it to the grand jury for indictment. The co-defendant, the former head of RMC’s investor relations team, pled guilty and testified against Wheet. Then-attorney Bill Nettles, in reference to the charges against Wheet, labeled the resources set aside for the investigation as “significant.”

Defense attorneys Daniel and Sullivan culled through a decade’s worth of company history, reports, filings, contracts, financial documents, and employee backgrounds to prepare for and combat the issues presented by the government.

Daniel focused on each of the consultants and highlighted their individual strengths, knowledge they could offer to RMCP, and the potential value they were capable and willing to add to the company. These consultants spanned a variety of careers and backgrounds, including professionals in the fields of health care, insurance, investing, and plastics manufacturing.

Sullivan cross-examined the co-defendant and led Wheet through a day of testimony explaining the company and its SEC filings.

Both attorneys carefully cross-examined the government’s witnesses. Among those were FBI investigating agents, forensic accountants, and securities analysts as well as past employees of the medical device company, including the co-defendant.

At the close of the trial, the federal jury returned a unanimous not guilty verdict for all three counts of securities fraud and false filings with the SEC. It was therefore ordered that Wheet be acquitted, discharged, and any bond exonerated.

------------------------

Bart Daniel defends government investigations in the areas of health care, securities, antitrust, and the False Claims Act, among others. Daniel has defended corporate officers and board members as well as fortune 500 companies in a wide range of civil and criminal investigations. While Daniel has extensive experience in trial defending white-collar criminal prosecutions, his greatest wins have come privately convincing prosecutors and investigators to decline criminal prosecution and quietly close their files. Daniel served as U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina from 1989–1992, and currently serves as president for the National Association of Former United States Attorneys. More information can be found at www.bartdaniel.com.www.bartdaniel.com.

Related Articles

SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing


by Don Andrews & Michael Manley

A Way Forward

SEC Focus on CCO Outsourcing

SEC Whistleblower Awards Are Spiraling. Could It Be Part of MeToo Movement?


by John Ettorre

The MeToo movement has had an unexpected impact on SEC-related whistleblower cases, and many are receiving substantial payouts for the financial fraud they are reporting.

Rise in Whistleblowing a Result of MeToo

Why Stablecoins Will Be Regulated


by Mladen Milovic

In Order To See Adoption, Stablecoins Must Clear These Hurdles

Why Stablecoins Will Be Regulated

Changing for the Better


by Justin Smulison

Joseph Brophy’s Austin-based boutique firm comprises some of the most talented and experienced civil litigators in Texas.

Betting on Finance, Civil Litigation Success

The Defense (Never) Rests


by Johanna Marmon

Dan Cogdell is a very busy man, but he’s just not the kind of lawyer who doesn’t return phone calls.

Dan Cogdell's Winning Criminal Defense

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?


by Christine Bestor Townsend

One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.

Illustration of two men pulling on string with blue door between them