Insight

Department of Labor Deflates the 80/20 Rule & Inflates the Tip Pool

Department of Labor Deflates the 80/20 Rule & Inflates the Tip Pool

Luis A. Santos

Luis A. Santos

December 22, 2022 02:12 PM

Department of Labor Deflates the 80/20 Rule & Inflates the Tip Pool

Executive Summary: On Monday, October 7, 2019, the Department of Labor (DOL) proposed a new 80/20 rule and tip pooling regulation. First, the proposed regulation, if finalized, will permit employers to take a tip credit regardless of the amount of non-tip generating work (such as cleaning tables or folding napkins) a tipped employee performs as long as it is performed contemporaneously with his/her tipped duties, or within a reasonable time immediately before or after performing tipped duties. Second, the proposed regulation eliminates some regulatory restrictions regarding tip pooling when the employer does not take a tip credit. If the proposed rule is finalized, employers who do not take a tip credit will be permitted to include “back-of-the-house” employees who usually do not receive tips (such as cooks and dishwashers) as part of a tip pool. Lastly, the existing rule prohibiting employers from keeping employees’ tips or participating in tip-pooling arrangements will remain.

Background: After Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2018, which amended section 3(m) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers have been waiting for the DOL to issue a new rule on the tip pooling amendments and tip credit applications. Under the existing rules, employees are entitled to receive at least the federal minimum wage from their employers. However, the FLSA allows employers to apply a “tip credit” towards reaching that direct minimum wage amount by counting a limited amount of tips from their tipped employees. These “tipped employees” are those who customarily and regularly receive more than $30 per month in tips. But if the tipped employee engages in non-tip generating work, like cleaning and prep work, for more than 20 percent of the shift, that employee is entitled to the full direct payment of the federal minimum wage without tip credit deductions.

The 80/20 rule has forced employers to pay the full minimum wage to employees who also garnered pooled or individual tips. Accurate recordings of time spent on tip generating vs. non-tip generating work is a hotbed for much litigation and a primary reason employers wanted further guidance from the DOL. The DOL admitted that the 80/20 rule is “difficult for employers to administer and causes confusion.” Now, the newly proposed rules would authorize an employer to apply a tip credit regardless of the amount of time that a tipped employee performs non-tip generating work during the shift, so long as the work is performed “contemporaneously with” the employee’s tipped duties, “or for a reasonable time immediately before or after performing the tipped duties.”

Current federal law requires tipped employees retain all their tips unless their tips are distributed through a valid tip pool. Those allowed to share in the tip pool are limited to tipped employees, regardless of whether their employer uses a tip credit as part of their compensation. Currently, a tip pool may not, “for any purposes,” include employers, “including allowing managers or supervisors to keep any portion of the employees’ tips.” The new proposed rule does not change these tip pooling procedures for employers who do take a tip credit—they may continue to have a traditional tip pool that is exclusively for “employees who customarily and regularly receive tips.” The DOL’s proposal also stands firm on its previously held position that employers, managers, and supervisors may not keep or share in the tips or pooled tips of its employees.

However, the newly proposed rule would expand the tip pool for employers who do not take a tip credit. Back-of-the-house employees, who do not traditionally receive direct tips, would be able to participate in and receive a cut from the tip pool. The DOL explained back-of-the-house “employees [also] contribute to the overall customer experience, but may receive less compensation than their traditionally tipped co-workers.” The DOL stated that it hopes this proposal will “help decrease the wage disparities” between the traditional tipped and non-tipped workers—an issue that many employers are battling with in trying to fill back-of-the-house positions.

Employers’ Bottom Line: If finalized, the DOL’s newly proposed rule will bring clarity to the 80/20 debate and foreclose some of the related litigation. Additionally, employers who do not take a tip credit may be able to make back-of-the-house positions more attractive by allowing those employees to receive additional income through tips. Note, employers should consider the laws of the states in which they do business and whether they have adopted any rules similar to or more stringent than the proposed federal 80/20 and tip pooling rule. The DOL’s proposed rules are not yet final and will be available to the public for review and comment for 60 days, until December 9, 2019.

If you have any questions regarding this issue or other wage and hour issues, please contact the authors of this Alert, Luis Santos, lsantos@fordharrison.com, partner in FordHarrison’s Tampa office. You may also contact any member of FordHarrison’s Restaurant Industry or Wage/Hour practice groups or the FordHarrison attorney with whom you usually work.

Related Articles

With Reservations


by Justin Smulison

Is vaccine liability on the menu for restaurant owners in 2021?

Vaccine Liability for Restaurant Owners

Media Tips in a High-Profile Case


by Gregory G. Rizio

How an Attorney Can Successfully Work With the Press

Media Tips in a High-Profile Case

The Impact of Duran on the Certification Process in Wage and Hour Class Actions


by Tim Freudenberger and Nancy Lubrano

In May 2014, class action defense attorney Tim Freudenberger from Carothers DiSante & Freudenberger LLP, obtained a very favorable decision from the California Supreme Court in Duran v. U.S. Bank Nat. Assn., 59 Cal. 4th 1 (2014).

Wage and Hour Class Actions

Safety Tips for Cooking with Grease and Oil


by Jason W. Konvicka

Cooking with oil or grease can result in delicious meals, but there are a number of risks involved.

Cooking Safety

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?


by Christine Bestor Townsend

One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.

Illustration of two men pulling on string with blue door between them