Insight

Freedom to Compete

Recent movement at the federal level regarding management-labor relations mean changes to enforcement of noncompete agreements and other covenants could be imminent.

Woman in front of open blue door
AP

Alyson M. St. Pierre and Ashley C. Pack

September 6, 2022 11:05 AM

On July 19, 2022, the Federal Trade Commission and National Labor Relations Board entered into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding what they called their shared “interest in protecting American workers and promoting fair competition in labor markets.”

In the memorandum, the FTC and NLRB stated that they “recognize that continued and enhanced coordination and cooperation concerning issues of common regulatory interest will help to protect workers against unfair methods of competition,” including “the imposition of one-sided and restrictive contract provisions, such as noncompete and nondisclosure provisions.” This follows President Biden’s executive order of July 9, 2021, directing the FTC to consider using its “statutory rulemaking authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act to curtail the unfair use of noncompete clauses and other clauses or agreements that may unfairly limit worker mobility.”

Considering this context, federal regulation that affects the use of noncompete agreements and other restrictive covenants, such as non-solicitation and nondisclosure agreements, appears to be in the offing. What can employers expect?

Recent Congressional bills provide clues. The Freedom to Compete Act was introduced into the Senate on July 15, 2021, by Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Margaret Hassan (D-NH). If enacted, it would ban noncompetes nationwide for workers classified as nonexempt pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. It would also apply to agreements inked before the bill’s passage. It would not ban confidentiality agreements used to protect trade secrets or other proprietary information as defined by law.

Rubio and Hassan’s bill follows a batch of state legislation regulating the use of noncompetes for low-wage workers. As of January 1, 2022, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Virginia and Washington all began imposing a wage thresholds on the enforceability of noncompete agreements.

Another piece of potential legislation is the Workforce Mobility Act, introduced by a bipartisan group of four senators on February 2021. A counterpart bill of the same name was introduced concurrently in the House. The act would ban all noncompete agreements except those entered into in connection with the sale of a business or the dissolution of a partnership, or those signed by senior executive officials in conjunction with a severance agreement.

Both the Freedom to Compete Act and the Workforce Mobility Act remain under consideration by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions; the latter is also under consideration by the House Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.

The Current State of Affairs

The passage of either bill or similar legislation would markedly change the use of restrictive covenants. Currently, these are governed by state law, which necessarily results in a legal patchwork across the country. Some states dictate the use and scope of covenants through statutes; others leave it to the courts to develop applicable law over time. Some, such as California and North Dakota, ban noncompetes outright, while most permit them within certain parameters.

To make things still more complicated, most states that permit noncompetes enforce them case by case, causing uncertainty and prompting costly litigation. In Indiana, for example, noncompetes are disfavored and will be enforced only if they’re narrowly tailored to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests in terms of the time, geography and scope of restricted activities. In addition to the employer’s legitimate interests, Indiana courts now require restrictive covenants to be tailored to the services actually performed by the restricted employee on behalf of the employer.

If enacted, it would ban noncompetes nationwide for workers classified as nonexempt pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act."

In Clark’s Sales & Service, Inc. v. John D. Smith & Ferguson Enterprises (2014), the Indiana Court of Appeals refused to enforce a noncompete agreement that restricted an appliance salesman from providing services competitive to those offered by his employer to any client that had been a customer during the employee’s tenure there. The court reasoned that restricting all services offered by the employer to all customers during the entire span of the salesman’s employment—regardless of whether the salesman had contact with those customers or helped offer the services—was overly broad and unreasonable.

The Indiana decision is just one example of how states and state courts have limited the use of noncompetes. Indiana is not alone in demanding particularity from employers seeking to use covenants to limit competition. Employers should engage competent counsel when drafting such agreements. Here’s why.

Considerations for Employers and Counsel

Given the changing and varied legal landscape of restrictive covenants, employers with multistate operations should think critically before using a form agreement across numerous jurisdictions given that what’s enforceable in one state is likely not in another. Instead, employers may opt to draft different agreements for each state or a single agreement that complies with the most restrictive jurisdiction in which they operate.

Employers who wish to protect their legitimate business interest should review their current agreements and determine whether they could be tailored more closely to their interests or the services and activities performed by the employees they wish to obligate through noncompetes and similar agreements. For instance, some employers with dated noncompetes may find that their current agreements no longer match their prevailing interests.

One commonly litigated issue is the use of geographic restrictions in noncompetes. As work becomes increasingly virtual, location-based strictures often no longer match the responsibilities or reach of the workforce. In such situations, unless an applicable jurisdiction requires a geographic restriction for the agreement to be enforceable, the employer might want to consider modifying it to restrict competition related to a narrow group of customers—such as those serviced by the employee—or competitors, instead of restricting competition more generally across a given area.

Regardless, until federal regulations or laws are enacted, employers and their counsel have much to juggle, as scattershot policy on restrictive covenants continues to change. Both management and their lawyers must remain up to date on developments that will affect their ability to enforce them—and be ready to update them quickly if necessary.

Ashley is a partner in the Charleston, West Virginia office of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. She has significant experience representing employers in a variety of labor and employment matters, including employment litigation, sexual harassment investigations, unfair labor practice and union representation cases. She also practices media and First Amendment law, advising newspapers and media outlets on prepublication review, FOIA and open records, advertising and defamation issues.

Aly is an associate in the Indianapolis office of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. She helps employers of all sizes across numerous industries navigate the nuanced legal and practical issues that arise in the workplace. She has experience litigating in multiple areas of labor and employment law, and also enjoys proactively counseling clients before litigation ensues.

Headline Image: ISTOCK/EONEREN, ISTOCK/TETIANA MYKHAILENKO

Related Articles

The Write Stuff


by Michele M. Jochner

A series of pointers for making your legal writing clear, concise and—crucially—persuasive.

Closed laptop with woman holding pencil

Punishment and Deterrents


by David A. Yeagley

Facing a jury instruction on punitive damages? Here’s a cheat sheet to help you secure the best possible outcome for the defendant you represent.

Seated man wearing glasses and looking down

Be Careful What You’re Waiving


by Danielle E. Tricolla and Gabriella E. Botticelli

It’s not true that any correspondence between attorney and client is de facto privileged. That protective wall can crumble quite easily, in fact. Here’s a primer.

Multicolor envelopes flying out of laptop screen

Best Lawyers Expands with New Artificial Intelligence Practice Area


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers introduces Artificial Intelligence Law to recognize attorneys leading the way in AI-related legal issues and innovation.

AI network expanding in front of bookshelf

When Can Ones to Watch Lawyers Be Nominated for Best Lawyers?


by Elizabeth Petit

Transitioning from Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch to Best Lawyers recognition.

Arrow symbolizing Ones to Watch Lawyers transitioning to Best Lawyers

Treacherous Waters, Uncharted Territory


by Bryan Driscoll

Political shifts around the globe this year are forcing international law and business to navigate a more intricate compliance landscape

Man in suit with telescope stands on deserted boat

The Human Cost


by Justin Smulison

2 new EU laws aim to reshape global business by enforcing ethical supply chains, focusing on human rights and sustainability

Worker wearing hat stands in field carrying equipemtn

Critical Period


by Armelle Royer and Maryne Gouhier

How the green-energy raw materials chase is rewriting geopolitics

Overhead shot of mineral extraction plant

Misinformation Age


by Gregory Sirico

As AI weaponizes lies, can global law, corporate business practices and legal associates adapt to the growing threat?

Animated hands shifting sides of a message cube

Ninth Circuit Blocks California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act


by Gregory Sirico

The Ninth Circuit halted aspects of the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act, reflecting free speech issues and the nuanced balance in regulating content.

Two children seated, using laptops

Tampa Appeals Court ‘Sends Clear Message,” Ensuring School Tax Referendum Stays on Ballot


by Gregory Sirico

Hillsborough County's tax referendum is back on the 2024 ballot, promising $177 million for schools and empowering residents to decide the future of education.

Graduation cap in air surrounded by pencils and money

The Importance of Content Marketing for Law Firms and Strategies for Success


by Jennifer Verta

Strengthen client relationships, boost visibility and drive growth with effective content marketing tailored for law firms.

Illustration of a central red figure surrounded by gray figures in a circular network

IN PARTNERSHIP

Trial Lawyers Protect Employees, Make Workplaces Safer


by Esquire Bank

Trial lawyers Jeffrey Laffey and Sean Flaherty fight hard for injured workers because of their own personal experiences with the aftermath of workplace injuries.

Lawyers Jeffrey Laffey and Sean Flaherty Protect Employees

How to Optimize Your Law Firm’s Website for SEO


by Best Lawyers

Making the most of your law firm's SEO is vital for marketing your legal practice and driving potential clients to your website. Here are a few basics you should know.

Magnet Attracting Metal Balls Symbolizing Law Firm SEO Strategy

US Criminal Law Legal Guide: Navigating Future Changes in Legislation


by Gregory Sirico

This article highlights noteworthy pending criminal justice reform legislation, such as the Equal Act, the First Step Implementation Act and the Federal Prison Oversight Act.

Capitol building split in half

The Hidden Constitutional Crisis: Maine’s Mounting Criminal Law Catastrophe


by Gregory Sirico

The number of criminal defendants lacking legal representation in Maine is skyrocketing like nowhere else in the US. Is there any stopping it?

Client in handcuffs sits across from lawyer

Trending Articles

2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.


by Jennifer Verta

Introducing the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America and the fifth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.

Digital map of the United States illuminated by numerous bright lights

Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence


by Jennifer Verta

Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.

Digital map of Canadathis on illuminated by numerous bright lights

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform


by Jennifer Verta

Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.

Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Find the Best Lawyers for Your Needs


by Jennifer Verta

Discover how Best Lawyers simplifies the attorney search process.

A focused woman with dark hair wearing a green top and beige blazer, working on a tablet in a dimly

Tampa Appeals Court ‘Sends Clear Message,” Ensuring School Tax Referendum Stays on Ballot


by Gregory Sirico

Hillsborough County's tax referendum is back on the 2024 ballot, promising $177 million for schools and empowering residents to decide the future of education.

Graduation cap in air surrounded by pencils and money

Key Developments and Trends in U.S. Commercial Litigation


by Justin Smulison

Whether it's multibillion-dollar water cleanliness verdicts or college athletes vying for the right to compensation, the state of litigation remains strong.

Basketball sits in front of stacks of money

Is Premises Liability the Same as Negligence?


by Jeremy Wilson and Taylor Rodney Marks

In today's age, we are always on the move, often inhabiting spaces we don't own. But what happens when someone else's property injures you or someone you know?

A pair of silhouetted legs falling down a hole with yellow background

Woman on a Mission


by Rebecca Blackwell

Baker Botts partner and intellectual property chair Christa Brown-Sanford discusses how she juggles work, personal life, being a mentor and leadership duties.

Woman in green dress crossing her arms and posing for headshot

Best Lawyers Celebrates Women in the Law: Ninth Edition


by Alliccia Odeyemi

Released in both print and digital form, Best Lawyers Ninth Edition of Women in the Law features stories of inspiring leadership and timely legal issues.

Lawyer in green dress stands with hands on table and cityscape in background