Insight

Pennsylvania Criminal History Record Information Act – Amendments Effective Today

Public Sector Alert - By Alyssa Golfieri, Anna Hosack and Anna Jewart

Alyssa Golfieri

Alyssa Golfieri

May 9, 2023 09:57 AM

Effective today, municipalities and law enforcement agencies must process record requests seeking criminal history information submitted under Act 134.

On November 3, 2022, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed into law Act 134 of 2022, which amended the Criminal History Record Information Act (CHRIA), to implement a new statutory process by which victims of crimes and defendants in certain civil actions can obtain criminal history investigative information gathered by law enforcement agencies (Act 134). Act 134 went into effect today, May 2, 2023, and is the latest of several statutory amendments impacting access to law enforcement records.

The important takeaways:

  • Similar to the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know Law (RTKL), which governs access to public records, Act 134 provides a process by which certain individuals may request criminal history investigative information from municipalities and law enforcement agencies.
  • Act 134 is not, however, an extension of nor an amendment to the RTKL. Act 134 is an independent statutory scheme implemented to provide crime victims and certain defendants in a civil action a definitive, stand-alone right to access criminal history investigative information—information that is generally not subject to access under the RTKL.
  • Unlike the RTKL, where the requester’s identity is not relevant, under Act 134, access to records is completely dependent on the requester’s identity. Act 134 makes an explicit distinction with respect to the right to access information between a crime victim and a defendant. Crime victims are entitled to access before or after a civil action is pending in a Pennsylvania court. Defendants are only entitled to access after a civil action is pending. Without a firm understanding of this distinction, municipalities and law enforcement agencies are at significant risk of disclosing confidential and sensitive criminal history investigative information without proper authority.
  • An Act 134 request must include or comply with the following:
    • A sufficiently specific description of the information sought.
    • A statement by the requester (or the requester’s representative), made subject to the penalties of unsworn falsification to authorities, that the information requested (i) is directly related to a civil action pending in Pennsylvania, or (ii) if the requester is a crime victim, is necessary to the investigation or preparation of a civil action in Pennsylvania.
    • Submitted to the municipality or law enforcement agency via personal service or certified mail with receipt. Requests submitted via e-mail do not trigger a municipality’s or law enforcement agency’s obligation to respond under Act 134.
  • Act 134 requests must be responded to within 60 days from the date of receipt of the request or by the date identified by the requester, whichever is later.
  • Act 134 exempts from disclosure certain personal information, including without limitation, social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, financial information, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses.
  • Act 134 authorizes municipalities and law enforcement agencies to redact or deny access to requested information under certain circumstances. For example, an Act 134 request may be redacted or denied if the release of the requested information would endanger a person or public safety, adversely affect an investigation or ongoing prosecution, relates to law enforcement’s use of confidential informants, or would identify a third-party victim of child abuse, domestic violence, or sexual abuse.

Due to the complexities of Act 134 and its interplay with the RTKL, municipalities and law enforcement agencies should consult their legal counsel immediately upon receipt of any request for criminal history investigative information in order to avoid the improper disclosure of sensitive or confidential information. If you have questions about how Act 134 will impact your organization, please contact Alyssa E. Golfieri at 412-773-8701 or agolfieri@babstcalland.com, Anna R. Hosack at 412-394-5406 or ahosack@babstcalland.com, or Anna Skipper Jewart at 412-253-8806 or ajewart@babstcalland.com.

Click here for PDF.

Trending Articles

Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.

Australia flag over outline of country

Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™


by Best Lawyers

The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.

French flag in front of country's outline

How To Find A Pro Bono Lawyer


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers dives into the vital role pro bono lawyers play in ensuring access to justice for all and the transformative impact they have on communities.

Hands joined around a table with phone, paper, pen and glasses

How Palworld Is Testing the Limits of Nintendo’s Legal Power


by Gregory Sirico

Many are calling the new game Palworld “Pokémon GO with guns,” noting the games striking similarities. Experts speculate how Nintendo could take legal action.

Animated figures with guns stand on top of creatures

Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.

New Zealand flag over image of country outline

Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.

British flag in front of country's outline

Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025


by Best Lawyers

For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.

Japan flag over outline of country

The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition


by Best Lawyers

For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.

Singapore flag over outline of country

Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.

German flag in front of country's outline

How Much Is a Lawyer Consultation Fee?


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers breaks down the key differences between consultation and retainer fees when hiring an attorney, a crucial first step in the legal process.

Client consulting with lawyer wearing a suit

Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™


by Best Lawyers

Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.

Italian flag in front of country's outline

Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide


by Best Lawyers

The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.

Illustration of several men and women in shades of orange and teal

Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You


by Ellie Shaffer

In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.

Car dashcam recording street ahead

Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias


by Sloan L. Abernathy

Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?

Lawyer speaking in courtroom with crowd and judge in the foreground

The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery


by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza

The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.

Red tape blocking off a section of street

Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?


by Christine Bestor Townsend

One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.

Illustration of two men pulling on string with blue door between them