\n
\nMr. Bannister served as an assistant U.S. Attorney from 1970-1974. With over 35 years of experience in the courtroom, Mr. Bannister provides counsel and advice in the areas of Criminal Law and Family Law. He has successfully tried cases throughout South Carolina, earning a listing in Best Lawyers of America for the past 24 years (1991-2014) for his work in DUI/DWI defense as well as white and non-white collar criminal defense.
\n
\nWith a high degree of professionalism, Mr. Bannister has tried cases focusing on White Collar Crime, Criminal Taxation, Civil Practice, Divorce, Fire Loss, Litigation, RICO, Internet Crimes, Drugs and Narcotics, Tax Evasion, Tax Fraud and Criminal Tax Audits.
\n
\nBorn in Union, S.C., Mr. Bannister is a member of the Greenville County and Federal Bar Associations, the South Carolina Bar, the South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association, the South Carolina Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America. He is also LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated.","CountryCode":"US","CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-biography highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBio","ViewName":"LawyerBio","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBio.cshtml"},"Contact":null,"Pages":[{"IsLoty":false,"LotyBadgeUrl":null,"PublicationListId":1,"HasLawyerProfileImage":true,"LawyerProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/lawyer-images/oscar-w-bill-bannister-jr-14380?t=2021101514295417","IsLocked":false,"HasLawyerProfile":true,"LawyerProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/oscar-w-bill-bannister-jr/14380","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"LawyerId":0,"LawyerFullName":"Oscar W. Bannister, Jr.","LawyerGivenName":"Oscar W.","LawyerMiddleName":null,"LawyerFamilyName":"Bannister","LawyerInitials":"OB","HasFirmProfile":false,"FirmProfileUrl":null,"FirmName":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, LLC","RecognizedSinceYear":1991,"LocationName":"Greenville, South Carolina","CountryCode":"US","TrafficId":14380,"TrafficCategory":"lawyer","PracticeAreas":["Criminal Defense: White-Collar","Criminal Defense: General Practice","DUI / DWI Defense"],"SpecificFocuses":[],"CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-basic-info card-lawyer-bl highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-charcoal background-white-lg background-white-lg-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBasicInfo","ViewName":"LawyerBasicInfo","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBasicInfo.cshtml"},{"PublicationListId":1,"HasLawyerProfileImage":true,"LawyerProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/lawyer-images/oscar-w-bill-bannister-jr-14380?t=2021101514295417","IsLocked":false,"HasLawyerProfile":true,"LawyerProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/oscar-w-bill-bannister-jr/14380","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"LawyerFullName":"Oscar W. Bannister, Jr.","LawyerGivenName":"Oscar W.","LawyerMiddleName":null,"LawyerFamilyName":"Bannister","LawyerInitials":"OB","Biography":"Oscar W. Bannister, Jr. (Bill) founded Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey along with John F. Wyatt in 2000. Mr. Bannister graduated from the Citadel in 1962 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in History. From 1962-1965, Mr. Bannister served as an officer in the U.S. Army. He attended law school at the University of South Carolina, where he received his J.D. in 1969. Mr. Bannister was admitted to the South Carolina bar, the U.S. District Court and the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1969.
\n
\nMr. Bannister served as an assistant U.S. Attorney from 1970-1974. With over 35 years of experience in the courtroom, Mr. Bannister provides counsel and advice in the areas of Criminal Law and Family Law. He has successfully tried cases throughout South Carolina, earning a listing in Best Lawyers of America for the past 24 years (1991-2014) for his work in DUI/DWI defense as well as white and non-white collar criminal defense.
\n
\nWith a high degree of professionalism, Mr. Bannister has tried cases focusing on White Collar Crime, Criminal Taxation, Civil Practice, Divorce, Fire Loss, Litigation, RICO, Internet Crimes, Drugs and Narcotics, Tax Evasion, Tax Fraud and Criminal Tax Audits.
\n
\nBorn in Union, S.C., Mr. Bannister is a member of the Greenville County and Federal Bar Associations, the South Carolina Bar, the South Carolina Trial Lawyers Association, the South Carolina Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America. He is also LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated.","CountryCode":"US","CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-biography highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBio","ViewName":"LawyerBio","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBio.cshtml"},null],"ViewName":"Paged","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Paged.cshtml","CssClass":"card d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-charcoal background-transparent swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"Paged"},{"BasicInfo":{"IsLoty":false,"LotyBadgeUrl":null,"PublicationListId":1,"HasLawyerProfileImage":true,"LawyerProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/lawyer-images/jan-lawrence-handzlik-12743?t=2021021122121680","IsLocked":false,"HasLawyerProfile":true,"LawyerProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/jan-lawrence-handzlik/12743","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"LawyerId":0,"LawyerFullName":"Jan Lawrence Handzlik","LawyerGivenName":"Jan Lawrence","LawyerMiddleName":null,"LawyerFamilyName":"Handzlik","LawyerInitials":"JH","HasFirmProfile":false,"FirmProfileUrl":null,"FirmName":"Jan Lawrence Handzlik, APC","RecognizedSinceYear":1983,"LocationName":"Los Angeles, California","CountryCode":"US","TrafficId":12743,"TrafficCategory":"lawyer","PracticeAreas":["Criminal Defense: White-Collar"],"SpecificFocuses":[],"CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-basic-info card-lawyer-bl highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-charcoal background-white-lg background-white-lg-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBasicInfo","ViewName":"LawyerBasicInfo","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBasicInfo.cshtml"},"Biography":{"PublicationListId":1,"HasLawyerProfileImage":true,"LawyerProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/lawyer-images/jan-lawrence-handzlik-12743?t=2021021122121680","IsLocked":false,"HasLawyerProfile":true,"LawyerProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/jan-lawrence-handzlik/12743","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"LawyerFullName":"Jan Lawrence Handzlik","LawyerGivenName":"Jan Lawrence","LawyerMiddleName":null,"LawyerFamilyName":"Handzlik","LawyerInitials":"JH","Biography":"
Jan Handzlik is an accomplished investigations and trial lawyer with a national and international practice. He represents individuals and organizations in investigations, prosecutions, regulatory enforcement actions and complex civil litigation in the United States and abroad. He also conduct corporate internal investigations, represent clients in multinational investigations, and advise domestic and foreign clients on law compliance and risk avoidance.
An experienced trial lawyer, Jan has tried well over 100 jury trials and numerous bench trials to verdict in US Federal and State courts. He is a nationally and internationally recognized authority on financial fraud, transnational crime and regulatory offenses, including civil and criminal securities fraud, money laundering, tax and bank fraud, procurement fraud and public corruption, as well as bribery and record-keeping violations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
As a federal prosecutor in the United States Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, Jan served in the Fraud & Special Prosecutions Section, conducting federal grand jury investigations and prosecuting fraud cases at trial and on appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Subsequently, Jan was one of the first independent law compliance monitors appointed by the US Department of Justice under the FCPA. As monitor, he evaluated the operations of a Swiss multinational corporation for three years. Jan is also one of only a handful of US lawyers to have successfully defended a corporation and its CEO at trial in a major FCPA prosecution, United States v. Lindsey Manufacturing Company, et al.
Jan has been recognized for his accomplishments and expertise in numerous national and international publications. He has been honored by his peers in all 29 editions of Best Lawyers in America-US News & World Report. In addition, Handzlik & Associates has again been recognized in Best Law Firms, the peer-reviewed companion publication to Best Lawyers.
California’s leading legal periodical, The Daily Journal, named Jan one of the “Top 100 Lawyers in California,” an honor given to “the state’s most influential attorneys.” He received the California Attorney of the Year Award (the “CLAY Award”) from California Lawyer Magazine for “extraordinary achievement” in criminal law. The Criminal Courts Bar Association of Los Angeles presented Jan with the Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Memorial Award, given for “exemplary commitment, exceptional skill and great achievement benefiting both his clients and the criminal justice community.” Jan was also honored with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (“NACDL”) White-Collar Criminal Defense Award.
Further recognition has been received from American Lawyer Media’s The American Lawyer Magazine; Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers; two journals published by Law Business Research Ltd. in the United Kingdom: The International Who’s Who Legal Business Crime Defence and Who’s Who Legal Investigations; Euromoney’s Guide to the World’s Leading Litigation Lawyers; Thompson-Reuters’ Super Lawyers Business Edition; and Martindale-Hubbell’s Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.
Jan is a past National Chair of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) National White-Collar Crime Committee. Jan also served as Co-Chair of the International Bar Association’s (IBA) International Business Crime Committee. He has held numerous other leadership positions in the IBA’s Criminal Law Section and ABA Sections on International Law, Business Law and Criminal Justice (CJS). This includes six years on the Governing Council of the Criminal Justice Section, five years on the ABA President’s Task Force on the Attorney-Client Privilege, and three years on the CJS Task Force for the revision of the ABA's Standards for the Prosecution and Defense of Criminal Cases.
In addition to bar association activities, Jan has participated extensively in pro bono public service initiatives, serving on several commissions and task forces investigating and evaluating the actions of law enforcement in Los Angeles and aspects of the California criminal justice system. He is also a frequent speaker and presenter on business crime, securities fraud, trial practice and transnational crime, at home and abroad. As Co-Chair of the IBA’s International Business Crime Committee, Jan organized and helped to present the annual Transnational Crime Conference in Istanbul, São Paulo, Miami Beach and Panama City, Panama, and staged mock trials at the Annual Conference of the IBA in Dublin and Vienna.
Handzlik & Associates represents individuals and organizations, both domestic and foreign, in white-collar criminal investigations and prosecutions, regulatory enforcement actions and complex civil litigation. The Firm conducts corporate internal investigations and represents clients in cross-border disputes. In addition to handling multinational investigations, the Firm often coordinates parallel civil, criminal and regulatory investigations and proceedings.
Jan Handzlik is an accomplished investigations and trial lawyer with a national and international practice. He represents individuals and organizations in investigations, prosecutions, regulatory enforcement actions and complex civil litigation in the United States and abroad. He also conduct corporate internal investigations, represent clients in multinational investigations, and advise domestic and foreign clients on law compliance and risk avoidance.
An experienced trial lawyer, Jan has tried well over 100 jury trials and numerous bench trials to verdict in US Federal and State courts. He is a nationally and internationally recognized authority on financial fraud, transnational crime and regulatory offenses, including civil and criminal securities fraud, money laundering, tax and bank fraud, procurement fraud and public corruption, as well as bribery and record-keeping violations under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
As a federal prosecutor in the United States Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, Jan served in the Fraud & Special Prosecutions Section, conducting federal grand jury investigations and prosecuting fraud cases at trial and on appeal to the Ninth Circuit. Subsequently, Jan was one of the first independent law compliance monitors appointed by the US Department of Justice under the FCPA. As monitor, he evaluated the operations of a Swiss multinational corporation for three years. Jan is also one of only a handful of US lawyers to have successfully defended a corporation and its CEO at trial in a major FCPA prosecution, United States v. Lindsey Manufacturing Company, et al.
Jan has been recognized for his accomplishments and expertise in numerous national and international publications. He has been honored by his peers in all 29 editions of Best Lawyers in America-US News & World Report. In addition, Handzlik & Associates has again been recognized in Best Law Firms, the peer-reviewed companion publication to Best Lawyers.
California’s leading legal periodical, The Daily Journal, named Jan one of the “Top 100 Lawyers in California,” an honor given to “the state’s most influential attorneys.” He received the California Attorney of the Year Award (the “CLAY Award”) from California Lawyer Magazine for “extraordinary achievement” in criminal law. The Criminal Courts Bar Association of Los Angeles presented Jan with the Johnnie L. Cochran Jr. Memorial Award, given for “exemplary commitment, exceptional skill and great achievement benefiting both his clients and the criminal justice community.” Jan was also honored with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (“NACDL”) White-Collar Criminal Defense Award.
Further recognition has been received from American Lawyer Media’s The American Lawyer Magazine; Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers; two journals published by Law Business Research Ltd. in the United Kingdom: The International Who’s Who Legal Business Crime Defence and Who’s Who Legal Investigations; Euromoney’s Guide to the World’s Leading Litigation Lawyers; Thompson-Reuters’ Super Lawyers Business Edition; and Martindale-Hubbell’s Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.
Jan is a past National Chair of the American Bar Association’s (ABA) National White-Collar Crime Committee. Jan also served as Co-Chair of the International Bar Association’s (IBA) International Business Crime Committee. He has held numerous other leadership positions in the IBA’s Criminal Law Section and ABA Sections on International Law, Business Law and Criminal Justice (CJS). This includes six years on the Governing Council of the Criminal Justice Section, five years on the ABA President’s Task Force on the Attorney-Client Privilege, and three years on the CJS Task Force for the revision of the ABA's Standards for the Prosecution and Defense of Criminal Cases.
In addition to bar association activities, Jan has participated extensively in pro bono public service initiatives, serving on several commissions and task forces investigating and evaluating the actions of law enforcement in Los Angeles and aspects of the California criminal justice system. He is also a frequent speaker and presenter on business crime, securities fraud, trial practice and transnational crime, at home and abroad. As Co-Chair of the IBA’s International Business Crime Committee, Jan organized and helped to present the annual Transnational Crime Conference in Istanbul, São Paulo, Miami Beach and Panama City, Panama, and staged mock trials at the Annual Conference of the IBA in Dublin and Vienna.
Handzlik & Associates represents individuals and organizations, both domestic and foreign, in white-collar criminal investigations and prosecutions, regulatory enforcement actions and complex civil litigation. The Firm conducts corporate internal investigations and represents clients in cross-border disputes. In addition to handling multinational investigations, the Firm often coordinates parallel civil, criminal and regulatory investigations and proceedings.
A managing partner of Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, James W. Bannister graduated from the University of South Carolina honors program in 1992 as a Phi Beta Kappa. He received his law degree from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1995, after which he served for two years as clerk to US Federal Judge Henry M. Herlong. Since then, he has been with Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey.
\nMr. Bannister is a member of the South Carolina Bar, Federal Bar Association, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and National Board of Trial Advocacy. Mr. Bannister has been honored among Greenville’s Legal Elite for criminal defense each year the award has been offered.
\nIn 2007, Mr. Bannister earned his Criminal Trial Advocacy Certification from the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He has tried numerous felony cases in both Federal and State Courts, and holds notable experience in cases involving Drugs and Narcotics, RICO, Internet Crimes, White Collar Crime, Security Fraud, Tax Evasion, Murder, Criminal Sexual Conduct, Criminal Domestic Violence, and DUI.
\nOn a national level, Mr. Bannister has been listed in Best Lawyers in America since 2008 for Criminal Defense and DUI Defense. He has also been included in South Carolina’s Super Lawyers for criminal defense since 2011. In 2016, Mr. Bannister became one of only three members of the South Carolina Bar to be named as a fellow to the American Board of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
\nIn addition to his private practice, Mr. Bannister serves on the Board of Governors for the South Carolina Bar and was recently elected as Commissioner for Greenville Water. Mr. Bannister formerly served on two criminal law task forces, as appointed by the South Carolina Supreme Court, and as a Commissioner on the Commission on Indigent Defense, a commission appointed by Governor Haley.
","CountryCode":"US","CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-biography highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBio","ViewName":"LawyerBio","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBio.cshtml"},"Contact":null,"Pages":[{"IsLoty":true,"LotyBadgeUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/badge-images/loty-thumbnail-award-2025.png","PublicationListId":1,"HasLawyerProfileImage":true,"LawyerProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/lawyer-images/james-w-bannister-64093?t=2021101514273767","IsLocked":false,"HasLawyerProfile":true,"LawyerProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/james-w-bannister/64093","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"LawyerId":0,"LawyerFullName":"James W. Bannister","LawyerGivenName":"James W.","LawyerMiddleName":null,"LawyerFamilyName":"Bannister","LawyerInitials":"JB","HasFirmProfile":false,"FirmProfileUrl":null,"FirmName":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, LLC","RecognizedSinceYear":2008,"LocationName":"Greenville, South Carolina","CountryCode":"US","TrafficId":64093,"TrafficCategory":"lawyer","PracticeAreas":["Criminal Defense: White-Collar","Criminal Defense: General Practice","DUI / DWI Defense"],"SpecificFocuses":[],"CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-basic-info card-lawyer-bl highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-charcoal background-white-lg background-white-lg-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBasicInfo","ViewName":"LawyerBasicInfo","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBasicInfo.cshtml"},{"PublicationListId":1,"HasLawyerProfileImage":true,"LawyerProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/lawyer-images/james-w-bannister-64093?t=2021101514273767","IsLocked":false,"HasLawyerProfile":true,"LawyerProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/james-w-bannister/64093","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"LawyerFullName":"James W. Bannister","LawyerGivenName":"James W.","LawyerMiddleName":null,"LawyerFamilyName":"Bannister","LawyerInitials":"JB","Biography":"A managing partner of Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, James W. Bannister graduated from the University of South Carolina honors program in 1992 as a Phi Beta Kappa. He received his law degree from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1995, after which he served for two years as clerk to US Federal Judge Henry M. Herlong. Since then, he has been with Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey.
\nMr. Bannister is a member of the South Carolina Bar, Federal Bar Association, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, South Carolina Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and National Board of Trial Advocacy. Mr. Bannister has been honored among Greenville’s Legal Elite for criminal defense each year the award has been offered.
\nIn 2007, Mr. Bannister earned his Criminal Trial Advocacy Certification from the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He has tried numerous felony cases in both Federal and State Courts, and holds notable experience in cases involving Drugs and Narcotics, RICO, Internet Crimes, White Collar Crime, Security Fraud, Tax Evasion, Murder, Criminal Sexual Conduct, Criminal Domestic Violence, and DUI.
\nOn a national level, Mr. Bannister has been listed in Best Lawyers in America since 2008 for Criminal Defense and DUI Defense. He has also been included in South Carolina’s Super Lawyers for criminal defense since 2011. In 2016, Mr. Bannister became one of only three members of the South Carolina Bar to be named as a fellow to the American Board of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
\nIn addition to his private practice, Mr. Bannister serves on the Board of Governors for the South Carolina Bar and was recently elected as Commissioner for Greenville Water. Mr. Bannister formerly served on two criminal law task forces, as appointed by the South Carolina Supreme Court, and as a Commissioner on the Commission on Indigent Defense, a commission appointed by Governor Haley.
","CountryCode":"US","CssClass":"card card-lawyer card-lawyer-biography highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover","AriaLabel":"LawyerBio","ViewName":"LawyerBio","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Lawyers/LawyerBio.cshtml"},null],"ViewName":"Paged","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Paged.cshtml","CssClass":"card d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-charcoal background-transparent swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"Paged"}],"ViewName":"Carousel","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Multiple/Carousel.cshtml"},"FirmCards":{"CarouselId":"carousel_fd425d0d908f4a12b6cadb5cef30e50a","Autoplay":false,"SlideDelay":10000,"SpaceBetween":0,"NumSlidesOnLoad":0,"SlidesPerView":0,"HideOverflow":false,"VeriticalAlignSlides":false,"AutoHeight":false,"FreeMode":{"enabled":true,"momentumBounce":false,"sticky":false},"ShowPagination":false,"ShowViewAllInsights":false,"Calculation":1,"Take":0,"Max":0,"MaxPageCount":20,"Page":1,"PageCount":0,"AjaxUrl":null,"SkipQueryKey":"skip","TakeQueryKey":"take","PageQueryKey":"page","PerPageQueryKey":"per-page","AjaxPropertyName":"cards","ArrowColor":3,"ArrowCssClasses":["background-inherit","border-0","d-flex","align-items-center","text-gold","text-darken-hover"],"ActivePageLinkCssClasses":["background-inherit","border","border-coral","rounded-pill","fs-8","fw-900","text-white","text-darken-hover"],"InactivePageLinkCssClasses":["background-inherit","border-0","fs-8","fw-600","text-light-gray-1","text-darken-hover"],"InitialState":0,"Cards":[{"Name":"Kerns Law Group","LocationName":"Wichita, Kansas","BestLawyersAwardCount":1,"CurrentEditionYear":null,"FirmProfileImageUrl":null,"FirmProfileUrl":null,"BadgeUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/badge-images/national-thumbnail-award-2025.png","BadgeType":"Best Law Firms","HasBestLawyersAwards":true,"IsBestLawFirm":false,"HasFirmProfileImage":false,"HasFirmProfile":false,"HasBadge":true,"TrafficId":84890,"TrafficCategory":"firm","FirmId":84890,"CssClass":"card card-firm card-firm-no-profile d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-charcoal background-light-gray background-light-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"FirmNoProfile","ViewName":"FirmNoProfile","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Firms/FirmNoProfile.cshtml"},{"Name":"Taft","LocationName":"Phoenix, Arizona","BestLawyersAwardCount":545,"CurrentEditionYear":null,"FirmProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/firm-profile-images/taft-stettinius-hollister-us-26137?t=2021021118085509","FirmProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/firms/taft/26137/US","BadgeUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/badge-images/national-thumbnail-award-2025.png","BadgeType":"Best Law Firms","HasBestLawyersAwards":true,"IsBestLawFirm":false,"HasFirmProfileImage":true,"HasFirmProfile":true,"HasBadge":true,"TrafficId":26137,"TrafficCategory":"firm","FirmId":26137,"CssClass":"card card-firm card-firm-basic-info highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"FirmBasicInfo","ViewName":"FirmBasicInfo","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Firms/FirmBasicInfo.cshtml"},{"Name":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, LLC","LocationName":"Greenville, South Carolina","BestLawyersAwardCount":5,"CurrentEditionYear":null,"FirmProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/firm-profile-images/bannister-wyatt-stalvey-us-33217?t=2021021118063181","FirmProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/firms/bannister-wyatt-stalvey-llc/33217/US","BadgeUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/badge-images/national-thumbnail-award-2025.png","BadgeType":"Best Law Firms","HasBestLawyersAwards":true,"IsBestLawFirm":false,"HasFirmProfileImage":true,"HasFirmProfile":true,"HasBadge":true,"TrafficId":33217,"TrafficCategory":"firm","FirmId":33217,"CssClass":"card card-firm card-firm-basic-info highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"FirmBasicInfo","ViewName":"FirmBasicInfo","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Firms/FirmBasicInfo.cshtml"},{"Name":"Jan Lawrence Handzlik, APC","LocationName":"Los Angeles, California","BestLawyersAwardCount":1,"CurrentEditionYear":null,"FirmProfileImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/firm-profile-images/jan-lawrence-handzlik-us-73224?t=2021090116582321","FirmProfileUrl":"https://www.bestlawyers.com/firms/jan-lawrence-handzlik-apc/73224/US","BadgeUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/badge-images/national-thumbnail-award-2025.png","BadgeType":"Best Law Firms","HasBestLawyersAwards":true,"IsBestLawFirm":false,"HasFirmProfileImage":true,"HasFirmProfile":true,"HasBadge":true,"TrafficId":73224,"TrafficCategory":"firm","FirmId":73224,"CssClass":"card card-firm card-firm-basic-info highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"FirmBasicInfo","ViewName":"FirmBasicInfo","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Firms/FirmBasicInfo.cshtml"}],"ViewName":"Carousel","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Multiple/Carousel.cshtml"},"InBriefCards":{"CarouselId":"carousel_52a94f6246fc44e4b5e420ff48ccbcfd","Autoplay":false,"SlideDelay":10000,"SpaceBetween":0,"NumSlidesOnLoad":0,"SlidesPerView":0,"HideOverflow":false,"VeriticalAlignSlides":false,"AutoHeight":false,"FreeMode":{"enabled":true,"momentumBounce":false,"sticky":false},"ShowPagination":false,"ShowViewAllInsights":false,"Calculation":1,"Take":0,"Max":0,"MaxPageCount":20,"Page":1,"PageCount":0,"AjaxUrl":null,"SkipQueryKey":"skip","TakeQueryKey":"take","PageQueryKey":"page","PerPageQueryKey":"per-page","AjaxPropertyName":"cards","ArrowColor":3,"ArrowCssClasses":["background-inherit","border-0","d-flex","align-items-center","text-gold","text-darken-hover"],"ActivePageLinkCssClasses":["background-inherit","border","border-coral","rounded-pill","fs-8","fw-900","text-white","text-darken-hover"],"InactivePageLinkCssClasses":["background-inherit","border-0","fs-8","fw-600","text-light-gray-1","text-darken-hover"],"InitialState":0,"Cards":[{"AuthorRawName":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey","AuthorFullName":"Bannister Wyatt & Stalvey","AuthorGivenName":"Bannister","AuthorMiddleName":"Wyatt &","AuthorFamilyName":"Stalvey","AuthorInitials":"BS","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/bannister-wyatt-stalvey-llc-compassionate-and-relentles-6120-3","ImageTitleText":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey: Compassionate and Relentless","ImageAltText":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey: Compassionate and Relentless","AuthorType":"Firms","TitleText":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey: Compassionate Service and Relentless Representation","CaptionText":"The attorneys at Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey, LLC are here to help you navigate your criminal case in South Carolina, specializing in DUIs, Criminal Sexual Conduct, Homicide and Expungement.","LinkUrl":"/article/compassionate-and-relentless/6120","LinkText":"Bannister, Wyatt & Stalvey: Compassionate and Relentless","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"TrafficId":6120,"TrafficCategory":"article","InPartnership":true,"CssClass":"card card-article card-article-by-best-lawyers highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"ArticleWithImage","ViewName":"ArticleWithImage","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Articles/ArticleWithImage.cshtml"},{"AuthorRawName":"Taft Stettinius & Hollister","AuthorFullName":"Taft Stettinius & Hollister","AuthorGivenName":"Taft","AuthorMiddleName":"Stettinius &","AuthorFamilyName":"Hollister","AuthorInitials":"TH","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/managing-the-pitfalls-of-restitution-in-federal-white-collar-6123-3","ImageTitleText":"Managing The Pitfalls of Restitution in Federal White-Collar","ImageAltText":"Managing The Pitfalls of Restitution in Federal White-Collar","AuthorType":"Firms","TitleText":"Managing The Pitfalls of Restitution in Federal White-Collar Cases","CaptionText":"While defense attorneys’ primary focus is on their clients serving as little jail time as possible, giving attention to restitution owed is just as important.","LinkUrl":"/article/managing-the-pitfalls-of-restitution/6123","LinkText":"Managing The Pitfalls of Restitution in Federal White-Collar","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"TrafficId":6123,"TrafficCategory":"article","InPartnership":true,"CssClass":"card card-article card-article-by-best-lawyers highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"ArticleWithImage","ViewName":"ArticleWithImage","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Articles/ArticleWithImage.cshtml"},{"AuthorRawName":"Gregory Sirico","AuthorFullName":"Gregory Sirico","AuthorGivenName":"Gregory","AuthorMiddleName":null,"AuthorFamilyName":"Sirico","AuthorInitials":"GS","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/maine-lacks-criminal-law-representation-6152-3","ImageTitleText":"Representation ","ImageAltText":"Client in handcuffs sits across from lawyers","AuthorType":"Other","TitleText":"The Hidden Constitutional Crisis: Maine’s Mounting Criminal Law Catastrophe","CaptionText":"The number of criminal defendants lacking legal representation in Maine is skyrocketing like nowhere else in the US. Is there any stopping it?","LinkUrl":"/article/maine-lacks-criminal-law-representation/6152","LinkText":" Maine Lacks Criminal Law Representation ","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"TrafficId":6152,"TrafficCategory":"article","InPartnership":false,"CssClass":"card card-article card-article-by-best-lawyers highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"ArticleWithImage","ViewName":"ArticleWithImage","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Articles/ArticleWithImage.cshtml"},{"AuthorRawName":"Gregory Sirico","AuthorFullName":"Gregory Sirico","AuthorGivenName":"Gregory","AuthorMiddleName":null,"AuthorFamilyName":"Sirico","AuthorInitials":"GS","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/us-criminal-law-legal-guide-6151-3","ImageTitleText":"Reform in Action","ImageAltText":"Capitol building split in half","AuthorType":"Other","TitleText":"US Criminal Law Legal Guide: Navigating Future Changes in Legislation","CaptionText":"This article highlights noteworthy pending criminal justice reform legislation, such as the Equal Act, the First Step Implementation Act and the Federal Prison Oversight Act.","LinkUrl":"/article/us-criminal-law-legal-guide/6151","LinkText":"US Criminal Law Legal Guide","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"TrafficId":6151,"TrafficCategory":"article","InPartnership":false,"CssClass":"card card-article card-article-by-best-lawyers highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"ArticleWithImage","ViewName":"ArticleWithImage","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Articles/ArticleWithImage.cshtml"},{"AuthorRawName":"Best Lawyers","AuthorFullName":"Best Lawyers","AuthorGivenName":"Best","AuthorMiddleName":null,"AuthorFamilyName":"Lawyers","AuthorInitials":"BL","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/why-criminal-defense-investigators-are-vital-5315-3","ImageTitleText":"Connect the Dots","ImageAltText":"Woman with hands on head stares at board of images","AuthorType":"Best Lawyers","TitleText":"The Role of a Criminal Defense Investigator","CaptionText":"The role of a criminal defense investigator in a case is often overshadowed by the more prominent figures in the legal field. Let's look more closely.","LinkUrl":"/article/criminal-defense-investigator-role/5315","LinkText":"Why Criminal Defense Investigators Are Vital","LinkTarget":null,"LinkRel":null,"TrafficId":5315,"TrafficCategory":"article","InPartnership":false,"CssClass":"card card-article card-article-by-best-lawyers highlight d-flex flex-column border-0 rounded text-white background-dark-blue-gray background-dark-blue-gray-highlighted-hover swiper-slide","AriaLabel":"ArticleWithImage","ViewName":"ArticleWithImage","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Articles/ArticleWithImage.cshtml"}],"ViewName":"Carousel","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Multiple/Carousel.cshtml"},"LawyerCardCount":17,"FirmRoute":false,"Artciles":null,"FeaturedArticle":{"LexicographicSortName":"prop36california2024criminaljusticereform","DocumentId":6143,"Id":6143,"ApplicationId":2,"Title":"Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform","SeoTitle":"Prop 36 California 2024: Stricter Sentencing & Reform","UrlTitle":"prop-36-california-2024-criminal-justice-reform","Meta":"Explore how Prop 36 California 2024 could change sentencing laws and impact the state's criminal justice reform efforts.","SourceType":"Content Team","Source":null,"SourceUrl":null,"Subheader":"Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.","Body":"Long a leader in criminal justice reform, the California legal system has been shaped by landmark legislation and evolving public sentiment.
As California grapples with dilemmas such as prison overcrowding, crime rates and public safety, voters often turn to ballot measures to make significant changes.
A new piece of legislation, Proposition 36, seeks to recall parts of Proposition 47 and impose stricter sentencing laws on repeat offenders. Recalling Prop 47 would mean reversing some of the reduced penalties for nonviolent crimes, reclassifying certain offenses from misdemeanors back to felonies, particularly for repeat offenders.
California voters will have the opportunity to decide on this ballot initiative during the statewide election in November 2024.
This article provides a guide to the nuances of California criminal law, highlighting Prop 36 California 2024 and its potential impact on state’s justice system, and analyzing how it aligns with the state’s ongoing efforts to balance public safety and criminal justice reform.
California’s Criminal Justice System: Past, Present and Key Reforms
To fully understand the significance of Proposition 36, it is essential to look at the evolution of California's criminal justice system, from its tough-on-crime policies of the past to the more reform-minded approach of recent years.
Historical Context of Criminal Justice Reform in California
California’s approach to criminal justice has undergone significant changes over the past several decades. The state’s notorious The Three Strikes and You're Out Law, enacted in the mid-1990s, was designed to impose harsher penalties on repeat offenders.
This policy led to a dramatic increase in the state’s prison population, contributing to severe overcrowding and placing significant financial strain on the state. Over time, public opinion shifted as concerns about mass incarceration, racial disparities in sentencing and the efficacy of such harsh laws grew.
These concerns prompted a series of reforms aimed at reducing prison populations and shifting the focus to rehabilitation. Key reforms Propositions 47 and 57 sought to reduce penalties for nonviolent crimes and provide more opportunities for early parole.
Key Criminal Justice Reforms Leading to Ballot Proposition 36 California
Proposition 47, passed in 2014, was a major step toward reducing incarceration for nonviolent offenses. The measure reclassified certain low-level crimes, such as drug possession and petty theft, from felonies to misdemeanors, significantly reducing the number of people sentenced to long prison terms.
Two years later, Proposition 57 was introduced, further expanding parole opportunities for nonviolent offenders. This initiative sought to lower recidivism by encouraging inmates to participate in rehabilitation programs that could shorten their sentences.
While these reforms were seen as progress toward a more rehabilitative system, critics argue they led to an increase in property crimes and gave repeat offenders leniency. These issues paved the way for Proposition 36, which seeks to reverse parts of Prop 47 that some believe have jeopardized public safety. The ongoing California Prop 47 recall effort centers on addressing these concerns, with a focus on stricter penalties for repeat offenders.
Current Challenges in California’s Criminal Justice System
Despite the reforms, California’s criminal justice system continues to face significant challenges. Prison overcrowding remains an issue, with some facilities operating at or above capacity.
Additionally, the recidivism rate—the likelihood that released prisoners will reoffend—remains high, raising concerns about the effectiveness of current rehabilitation programs.
Ballot Proposition 36 California: What It Is and What It Aims to Do
Prop 36 2024 seeks to tighten sentencing laws for repeat offenders, particularly those with multiple serious or violent convictions. The measure addresses what its supporters see as loopholes in Proposition 47, which they argue have allowed repeat offenders to avoid significant punishment.
By reinstating felony charges for individuals convicted of multiple offenses, Prop 36 aims to deter repeat criminal activity and enhance public safety. However, critics caution that the measure risks reversing progress in reducing incarceration, potentially leading to a resurgence in punitive sentencing practices without addressing the root causes of crime.
California Prop 47 Recall: The Controversy
Proposition 47 was seen as a landmark reform aimed at reducing prison overcrowding by lowering the classification of certain nonviolent crimes from felonies to misdemeanors.
It allowed thousands of individuals convicted of drug possession, petty theft and other minor offenses to either serve reduced sentences or avoid prison time altogether. Supporters praised Prop 47 as a progressive measure that aligned with California’s broader shift toward rehabilitation and reducing the overall incarceration rate.
However, law enforcement agencies and some members of the public argue that the law has inadvertently contributed to an increase in certain types of crimes, particularly property crimes.
According to these critics, the reclassification of crimes has allowed repeat offenders to avoid significant penalties, creating a revolving door of criminal activity. Opponents also argue that Prop 47 has emboldened repeat offenders by reducing the consequences of their actions, particularly in urban areas where crime rates have reportedly increased since the measure was passed. Dissatisfaction with Proposition 47 sparked the movement for Prop 36 California 2024.
Legal Implications of CA Prop 36
If Prop 36 2024 is passed, it will mark a significant shift in California's approach to handling repeat offenders. By reinstating felony charges for individuals convicted of multiple nonviolent offenses, the proposition signals a return to stricter sentencing laws. Supporters argue this approach will deter habitual offenders and enhance public safety by ensuring repeat offenders face more severe consequences.
Critics warn that harsher sentencing guidelines under Prop 36 could reverse the gains made in reducing incarceration, particularly for repeat offenders of nonviolent crimes. This has raised concerns about a potential shift away from rehabilitation, leading to an increase in the prison population.
The debate surrounding Proposition 36 highlights the broader tension between punishment and rehabilitation in California's criminal justice system. While the measure seeks to address public safety concerns, critics argue it risks reigniting a cycle of mass incarceration without addressing the root causes of crime, such as lack of access to mental health and rehabilitation programs.
Pending Legislation and Legal Trends in Criminal Justice Reform California
California’s approach to criminal justice is in flux, with multiple legislative efforts aimed at reforming or reinforcing certain aspects of the system. Alongside Proposition 36, there are several other pieces of legislation pending that seek to address issues like prison overcrowding, sentencing reform and rehabilitation.
Senate Bill 81
Senate Bill 81 (SB 81) is a notable reform that seeks to limit the use of sentence enhancements, particularly for nonviolent crimes. Sentence enhancements—additional penalties added to a sentence based on prior offenses or the circumstances of the crime—have historically contributed to longer prison terms and higher incarceration rates.
SB 81 allows judges more discretion in dismissing these enhancements when there are mitigating factors, such as mental illness or trauma. This bill is seen as part of California’s broader push to reduce excessive sentencing and focus more on rehabilitation than punishment.
Senate Bill 94
Another important measure is Senate Bill 94 (SB 94), which provides a \"second look\" at life sentences. This bill allows individuals serving life without the possibility of parole, particularly those convicted of crimes committed before the age of 25, to petition for resentencing after serving 25 years.
This bill reflects the growing recognition that long sentences may not always serve the interests of justice, especially when considering rehabilitation and personal growth. SB 94 represents another step toward California's efforts to address the long-term effects of harsh sentencing policies.
Legal Complexities and Idiosyncrasies of California’s Criminal Justice System
California’s criminal justice system is unique in many ways, particularly in its reliance on ballot propositions to enact major legal changes. This voter-driven process has allowed the public to have a direct say in shaping the state’s laws, but it has also introduced complexities that make the legal system more difficult to navigate.
One of the key idiosyncrasies of California’s system is its approach to sentencing. The state's history of punitive policies has created a system where repeat offenders face significantly harsher penalties than in other states.
While recent reforms have attempted to reverse some of these policies, Proposition 36 California could mark a return to more stringent sentencing laws for certain crimes.
Additionally, California’s legal system is influenced by public sentiment, which can fluctuate over time. This is evident in the shift from the “tough on crime” era of the 1990s to the more reform-minded policies of the 2010s.
However, measures like Prop 36 California 2024 suggest that there is still strong public support for stricter laws in certain areas, particularly when it comes to addressing repeat offenders.
While ballot propositions enable rapid legal changes in California, they also mean that the state’s laws can shift significantly based on changing public opinion.
The Future of Criminal Justice Reform in California
The future of criminal justice reform in California is uncertain. While the state has made critical strides toward reducing incarceration and focusing on rehabilitation, measures like CA Prop 36 show that there is still significant debate over how to address issues like recidivism and public safety. Regardless of the outcome of the 2024 election, criminal justice reform in California will remain a critical issue for years.
Stay Updated and Protect Your Rights
With Prop 36 California 2024 and other criminal justice reforms on the horizon, it is essential to stay prepared. Visit our page on Criminal Defense in California to connect with experienced defense lawyers who can help you navigate potential legal changes and ensure your rights are protected.
","SearchEnabled":true,"IsDisabled":false,"LotySpotlight":false,"ArticleType":null,"Url":"/article/prop-36-california-2024-criminal-justice-reform/6143","LawyerProfileUrl":null,"ArticleDate":null,"CreatedDate":"2024-09-19T19:56:39.543","ReleaseDate":"2024-09-23T00:00:00","PublishYear":2024,"LastModifiedDate":null,"EditDate":"2024-10-03T19:42:53.84","LawyerLinked":null,"FrontPage":false,"LandingPageUrl":null,"ViewCount":146,"AuthorProfileImageUrl":null,"LotyLawyerFullName":null,"LotyPracticeArea":null,"LotyMetro":null,"LotyYear":null,"ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/prop-36-california-2024-stricter-sentencing-reform-6143-3","InPartnership":false,"IsSample":false,"ShowLegalGuideFooter":true,"PublicationId":484,"BLFHeadline2":false,"Keywords":[{"Id":100,"ArticleId":6143,"NewsId":0,"Text":"California","NormalizedText":"california","UseForRelatedContent":true},{"Id":4954,"ArticleId":6143,"NewsId":0,"Text":"Criminal Law","NormalizedText":"criminal-law","UseForRelatedContent":true},{"Id":5487,"ArticleId":6143,"NewsId":0,"Text":"Criminal Law 2025","NormalizedText":"criminal-law-2025","UseForRelatedContent":true},{"Id":5003,"ArticleId":6143,"NewsId":0,"Text":"For Clients","NormalizedText":"for-clients","UseForRelatedContent":false},{"Id":4151,"ArticleId":6143,"NewsId":0,"Text":"Criminal Attorney","NormalizedText":"criminal-attorney","UseForRelatedContent":true}],"Firms":[],"Lawyers":[],"Images":[{"ArticleId":6143,"PublishId":0,"Id":17738,"ImageTypeId":1,"ImageTypeName":"Article Headline Image","HTMLAlternateDescription":"Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background","HTMLTitle":"Breaking Free from Chains","ImageCreditor":"Adobe Stock/Darren Green","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/prop-36-california-2024-stricter-sentencing-reform-6143-5","ImageHeight":0,"ImageWidth":0,"ImageByteData":null,"ImageData":null},{"ArticleId":6143,"PublishId":0,"Id":17741,"ImageTypeId":2,"ImageTypeName":"Card Image","HTMLAlternateDescription":"Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background","HTMLTitle":"Breaking Free from Chains","ImageCreditor":"Adobe Stock/Darren Green\t","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/prop-36-california-2024-stricter-sentencing-reform-6143-3","ImageHeight":0,"ImageWidth":0,"ImageByteData":null,"ImageData":null},{"ArticleId":6143,"PublishId":0,"Id":17737,"ImageTypeId":3,"ImageTypeName":"Social Share Image","HTMLAlternateDescription":"Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background","HTMLTitle":"Breaking Free from Chains","ImageCreditor":"Adobe Stock/Darren Green\t","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/prop-36-california-2024-stricter-sentencing-reform-6143-4","ImageHeight":0,"ImageWidth":0,"ImageByteData":null,"ImageData":null}],"ArticleAuthors":[{"ArticleId":6143,"AuthorType":"Other","AuthorId":0,"AuthorName":"Jennifer Verta","AuthorImageUrl":null,"FirmName":null,"LawyerName":null,"FirmId":null,"FirmProfileImage":null,"AuthorProfileUrl":null,"AuthorFirmProfileUrl":null,"CountryCode":null}],"ArticleVisibilities":[{"ArticleId":6143,"VisibilityTypeId":3,"Type":"For Clients","PublishId":0},{"ArticleId":6143,"VisibilityTypeId":5,"Type":"Legal Guide","PublishId":0},{"ArticleId":6143,"VisibilityTypeId":1,"Type":"Insights Main Article","PublishId":0}],"Publications":[{"ArticleId":6143,"PublicationId":484,"Title":"Criminal Law | Legal Guide","DigitalPublicationType":2,"Year":0,"TitleYearDisplayName":null}],"AuthorName":"Jennifer Verta","AuthorType":"Other","SearchItemType":10,"SearchItemTypeName":"Article","SearchSortOrder":3,"SortTitle":"prop36california2024criminaljusticereform","HideFromSearch":false},"FeaturedArticleImage":{"ArticleId":6143,"PublishId":0,"Id":17738,"ImageTypeId":1,"ImageTypeName":"Article Headline Image","HTMLAlternateDescription":"Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background","HTMLTitle":"Breaking Free from Chains","ImageCreditor":"Adobe Stock/Darren Green","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/prop-36-california-2024-stricter-sentencing-reform-6143-5","ImageHeight":0,"ImageWidth":0,"ImageByteData":null,"ImageData":null},"FeaturedArticleMobileImage":{"ArticleId":6143,"PublishId":0,"Id":17741,"ImageTypeId":2,"ImageTypeName":"Card Image","HTMLAlternateDescription":"Illustrated Hands Breaking Chains Against a Bright Red Background","HTMLTitle":"Breaking Free from Chains","ImageCreditor":"Adobe Stock/Darren Green\t","ImageUrl":"https://cdn.blrankings.com/best-lawyers/article-images/prop-36-california-2024-stricter-sentencing-reform-6143-3","ImageHeight":0,"ImageWidth":0,"ImageByteData":null,"ImageData":null},"FlexibleContentHeadline":{"Headline":null,"ViewName":"Razor","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Headlines/Razor.cshtml"},"PlatinumLawyersCarousel":{"CarouselId":"carousel_f1aa11ca1ae149759fe2b1e8cd00f023","Autoplay":false,"SlideDelay":10000,"SpaceBetween":0,"NumSlidesOnLoad":0,"SlidesPerView":0,"HideOverflow":false,"VeriticalAlignSlides":false,"AutoHeight":false,"FreeMode":{"enabled":true,"momentumBounce":false,"sticky":false},"ShowPagination":false,"ShowViewAllInsights":false,"Calculation":1,"Take":0,"Max":0,"MaxPageCount":20,"Page":1,"PageCount":0,"AjaxUrl":null,"SkipQueryKey":"skip","TakeQueryKey":"take","PageQueryKey":"page","PerPageQueryKey":"per-page","AjaxPropertyName":"cards","ArrowColor":3,"ArrowCssClasses":["background-inherit","border-0","d-flex","align-items-center","text-gold","text-darken-hover"],"ActivePageLinkCssClasses":["background-inherit","border","border-coral","rounded-pill","fs-8","fw-900","text-white","text-darken-hover"],"InactivePageLinkCssClasses":["background-inherit","border-0","fs-8","fw-600","text-light-gray-1","text-darken-hover"],"InitialState":0,"Cards":[],"ViewName":"Carousel","ViewPath":"~/Views/Shared/Components/Cards/Multiple/Carousel.cshtml"},"LegalGuideResultsPerPage":10,"HasPopupProvider":false,"PopupProvider":null,"PopupProviderWidgetName":{"Type":{"Id":6,"Token":"FullscreenSplash","SupportedFeedTypes":[{"Id":3,"Value":3,"Name":"Popup"}],"SupportedModelTypes":["Foundation.Models.Editorial.FlexContent.IPopupProvider, Foundation.Models, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null"],"DefaultFeedPools":[{"DisplayName":"Popup","Value":"Popup","Name":"Popup"}],"Preview":{"Width":1920,"Height":1080,"Scale":0.27},"Value":6,"Name":"Fullscreen Splash"},"Page":{"Name":"PublicationEditions","Application":{"Id":2,"ApplicationName":"Best Lawyers","ApplicationShortName":"bl","ApplicationType":1}},"Application":{"Id":2,"ApplicationName":"Best Lawyers","ApplicationShortName":"bl","ApplicationType":1},"AllowedPools":[{"DisplayName":"Popup","Value":"Popup","Name":"Popup"}],"AllowedKeys":[{"DisplayName":"PublicationKey","Value":"publicationId","Name":"publicationId"},{"DisplayName":"ForAuthenticatedKey","Value":"forAuthenticated","Name":"forAuthenticated"},{"DisplayName":"FirmKey","Value":"firmId","Name":"firmId"}]},"HasBannerProvider":false,"BannerProvider":null};var _hasFullScreenSplash=false;var _showLegalGuideFooter="";Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform
by Jennifer Verta
Explore how Prop 36 could shape California's sentencing laws and justice reform.
Read Full ArticleRefine results by using the search bar or filters within each column.