Last spring, I participated on a CLE panel presentation for in-house attorneys on creative legal theories that plaintiffs are pursuing in environmental and toxic tort litigation. For many of the theories we covered, we advised our audience that the case law is still developing and it isn't always easy to predict how a court might rule, particularly at the trial court level. But on one topic—the availability of class actions to pursue medical monitoring for alleged exposure to a toxic chemical—I felt fairly certain about the future, suggesting to the audience that we shouldn't see them any longer, at least not in federal court. Now, just a year later, the surge in toxic tort cases on account of PFAS and other so-called "emerging contaminants" has caused me to revisit my prediction, and serves as a reminder of how public health concerns can shape the law in some fairly fundamental ways.
Read the full article: https://www.mankogold.com/publications-articles-PFAS-Litigaton-Class-Treatment-Claims.html
Insight
Will PFAS Litigation Revive Class Treatment for Medical Monitoring Claims?
Will PFAS Litigation Revive Class Treatment for Medical Monitoring Claims?
October 20, 2022 06:30 PM
Related Articles
Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias
by Sloan L. Abernathy
Protecting Small Business Owners: Trial Experts Connick Law LLC Notoriously Successful with Fire Litigation
by Justin Smulison
Trending Articles
2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.
by Jennifer Verta
Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Editions in Brazil, Mexico, Portugal and South Africa
by Jennifer Verta
Prop 36 California 2024: California’s Path to Stricter Sentencing and Criminal Justice Reform
by Jennifer Verta